• xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Chemicals” in food. Literally every substance, every food and people are composed of them. The common usage has bastardized the meaning and latched on to the naturalistic fallacy. Snake venom is natural. Cyanide is natural. Arsenic and Uranium are natural. Botulinum toxin is natural. Something being naturally occurring does not automatically make it good for you just as something being made in a lab does not equate to being bad for you.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      My least favorite is “it’s processed”

      I can count the ingredients on my hands, and the “processing” is like 4 steps max.

      • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        A guy at a deli counter slicing cold cuts and assembling them into a sandwich is “processed food”. Using the term as a health concern marker is meaningless.

        Even Kraft Singles, the posterchild of “processed food”, famously disallowed to legally call itself “cheese” on its packaging, what is it made of? What hellish process hath humanity wrought? Cheddar cheese, sodium citrate (a mundane variety of salt), and water. That’s it.

        It’s not forbidden from being called “cheese” because it’s a bastard concoction of mad scientist chemicals that approximate cheese to ruse consumers. It’s simply cheese, literally watered down to the point that you can’t call it cheese anymore.

        All that the sodium citrate is doing in this situation is acting as a binder that helps the cheese solids hold on to the water. This action is what gives many dishes, sauces, and the like their smooth, creamy texture. But use the word for that – “emulsifier” – and suddenly people think you’re trying to poison them, because that’s a scary chemical word.

        Why does this product exist? Because it offers a unique melty texture that people appreciate in certain contexts. It’s a niche product with a niche function. Treat it like one.

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Furries. They’re some of the nicest people ever. I’m a cosplayer and our worlds intersect a lot. They raise more money for charity than any group as small as they are, they’re kind and accepting, and they’re wicked talented. I trust Furries before muggles anyday

  • june@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 months ago

    haven’t seen it in the thread yet, but (most) GMOs. The foods and technology aren’t the problem, it’s a solution to ending hunger. It’s the corporate interests that squash competition that’s the problem.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Socialism/Communism/Anarchism. Barely anyone who actually understands them and the theory supporting them hates them, but tons of people have been fed Red Scare propaganda on the matter.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, those who most benefit from the status quo also understand those concepts quite well, but oppose them.

      • PineRune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think most real-life examples have been plagued by corruption to the point that they fall into a different category altogether.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Historical examples, like Revolutionary Catalonia for Anarchism, and the USSR, Cuba, Maoist China, Vietnam, etc. for Marxism-Leninism, absolutely count as Socialist and should be learned from, both the good and bad.

          If you dismiss them as “not real Socialism,” you fail to learn from what did work in those instances, like literacy rates and life expectancy skyrocketing. If you dismiss the bad, you make the equal mistake of not accounting for the flaws in systems like Soviet Democracy, which resulted in a corrupt Politburo with outsized power.

          Study them in detail and find what to take and what to leave behind.

          • federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            communism is a classless stateless moneyless society. is that how you’d describe any of those societies? i wouldn’t. because it’s not true. but there are certainly anarchist and communist societies that have existed.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Cuba, a poor blockaded small island nation, has a higher life expectancy than the global hegemon and richest nation ever

        The USSR went from a monarchist backwater to a industrial society, defeating the nazis and sending the first satellite into space, in the span of 40 years.

        China, under socialism, is now on track to shatter US hegemony through the power of socialist economic management and mutually beneficial cooperation.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 months ago

    The idea of using public transportation. It’s something for “them” (the poor), not for “me” (rich). Changes significantly from country to country, I suppose, but it’s a prevalent thought here.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Idk at least in the US, riding a train is a nice experience. I liked it. But riding busses is often rather unpleasant. But I only have limited experience to only a portion of the US.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I noticed in the States that if its a bus, its a chariot for the poor. If its a train, its for everyone.

    • knexcar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      TBF considering how slow/unreliable and infrequent it tends to be, it’s hard to believe anyone would use it if they didn’t have other options. Even in my city (where buses run 30 minutes instead of every hour as is common elsewhere), it takes an hour and 15 minutes to get somewhere that’s a straight 15 minute freeway drive by car. And it’s worse in larger cities where buses are delayed by traffic such that you miss your transfer.

      And it’s not like improvements like BRT or light rail will change it much considering how often they run in boulevards with 35mph speed limits and stop lights vs the 65mph grade separated freeways. Even a grade separated subway would be slower than driving unless it had spaced out stops, but then walking to said stops would take a lot of time (plus we couldn’t afford one, especially not one that actually serves the sprawl).

      Under these conditions, it’s understandable to not even bother considering it as an option.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am by no means poor and I save a lot of money by not having a car, but the fact of the matter is that people give me rides more than I would like. Even in Portland, a city with relatively good transit for its size given that it’s in the US, most of the city is still quite inaccessible.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Conservatives seem to really hate electric cars for some reason. You’d think that for all the bitching they do regarding how Dark Brandon is personally hiking gas prices as part of his pinko commie agenda they’d like to stick it to him and stop paying for gas, but no, they take personal offense as if an electric car is somehow emasculating.

    • Davidvanb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They are paid to “take personal offense” by lobbyists. They actually don’t give two shits one way or the other about electric cars.

      • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Idk I see a lot of stupid memes on conservative mocking groups on Facebook that they post. Perhaps they don’t care.

        • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The people in charge don’t give a shit, but again, they’re paid to care so they spew the hate to their followers who eat that shit up like a fat guy at an all you can eat buffet. They’re really good at doing what they’re told

      • Truffle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, being fat shouldn’t be a qualifier for anything IMHO. Like, let people live their lives in peace! There are pleasant and unpleasant fat people, as there are thin, so why does weight have to do with anything?! It is baffling to me we have to work so hard to humanize fat persons. Fat bias is so ingrained in our culture people think is ok.

        • ULS@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Some of the fat people I’ve worked with were so much more hard working than others. But on other hand some customers I’ve dealt with were the worst customers. There was a notorious mother daughter duo that my co workers labeled the “Thunder Cunts”. The sad part is they had kids that probably.lived a life of hell.

          • Truffle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, child abuse is no joke. I bet you also had non fat customers who were a pain in the ass too, so it is not about weight, but about being an insufferable tw4twaffle.

            • ULS@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yeah I worked in a really shitty area. It was heartbreaking seeing how shitty people were.

      • june@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        And very cuddly and squeezable. I like touching fat folks as much as I like touching for folks. All bodies are nice.

    • chetradley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s important to note that when you hear a story about Satanists using freedom of religion to install a statue of baphomet in a public space, or citing religious freedom acts to protect safe access to abortion, you’re hearing about the Satanic Temple. When you hear about Satanists practicing “chaos magick” or talking about how liking blue cheese means you’re gay, you’re hearing about the Church of Satan. Here’s a handy reference from TST:

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I really should get around to setting up a recurrent donation to TST at some point. Especially with the recent stuff they’ve done to oppose fundamentalist religions being given special privileges in state government and education, they deserve more ongoing funding.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Comic sans.

    It is literally a font. Sometimes when some corporate partner is annoying me I will pdf lock a document, with a signature, to them in comic sans.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I know you probably already hate me for mentioning it, but foot fetishes. It’s a very common fetish people have and I don’t think people should be ashamed of it. It’s not even the weirdest fetish out there when it comes down to it. I understand the stigma comes from weird dudes asking girls for feet pics in creepy ways and I feel like that’s reasonable. But most of us are just regular people just trying to live our best life. I used to feel comfortable telling women I’m with that I have a foot fetish and most of them were even down to give it a try. Nowadays I’m too embarrassed or ashamed to even mention it and when I do I get shot down more often than before because of this stigma. I’m more comfortable these days telling someone that I’m bisexual than telling someone I like feet. Which I guess is a win for the gay part of me, but it still sucks.

    • Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not into that at all (tbh I find feet kinda disgusting) but I’ve never seen it as something really weird because it really isn’t that weird.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I spent some time explaining amputee fetish to my CW the other day (which is actually called body identity integrity disorder). I’m just glad there are people who like their limbs and appendages attached.