• sadeiko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Best interaction with an antimasker:

    Them: masks don’t work

    Me: We’ll I’m going to wear one anyway

    Them: Well then you’re just traping the germs against your face

    Me: so you’re saying they block germs?

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They even stated the correct reason to wear a mask: to trap the germs against my face, so others don’t get infected

      It’s like they don’t compute the idea behind it, it stops at me me me

      • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Someone once told me that the box in which masks came in says “doesn’t protect from viruses”, as if it was hidden-in-plain-sight proof that masks don’t work.

        Yeah, they don’t protect the user from viruses, they protect other people. The box is technically correct, Patricia, there is no conspiracy here.

          • drengbarazi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            They will, but you have to follow some protocols, like not having beard where the masks is supposed to seal around your face, not using it more than ~3 times (iirc), not trying to clean it (just let it rest for some days on a clean surface) and etc.

            Basically always seal testing.

            Also, iirc the N stands for not oil resistant, so any oil staining ruins it. I’d guess that includes sneezing on it.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It is humorous that these people think that they have some secret knowledge that only they know and they feel so much power because of it. Except that the information they know is incorrect and they just end up looking like an idiot.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      While it is fun to tweak their titties with this, it will make zero difference on their position because their position wasn’t arrived at by rational thought.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      My favorite interactions was going into Walmart.

      It was mid/early spring, right as things were starting to lockdown. I wasn’t wearing a jacket cuz it was glorious out.

      Some old boomer lady started harassing me over not wearing a jacket and blah blah blah.

      She wouldn’t shut up, and was blocking me from walking in, so I faked a sneeze. The look of horror on her face as she fled.

      (And I’m pretty sure that was also the fastest time in and out of a Walmart…)

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am reasonably sure that a fair many conservatives feel that they are entitled to their biases and fallacies and the world must bend to these biases.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s deeper than that, they literally believe they can change objective reality by believing hard enough.

      That’s why they excuse all of their bad acts, if they ignore it, it doesn’t exist to them.

      Negative object permanence.

      • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think you are right. I believe it is somehow related their obsessive belief in their religion.

        I am not saying that all religious people are bad. But, somehow, these people excuse their bad behaviour by quoting scriptures. There has to a correlation too.

        • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, their religion is a paper thin pretext. They don’t actually do anything the Bible says to do, and they do a FUCKTONNE of what the Bible explicitly prohibits.

          And I’m so tired as a progressive Christian of these cuntservative evangelicals convincing all of the internet that any theist is a mouth foaming bigot.

        • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can, and they’re useful, and tulpa is a stupid fucking name. There I said it.

          The only thing about them is that they are really only useful for organizing parts of yourself that you are not consciously aware of. You can’t manifest a slenderman IRL but you can make a mind palace and vastly improve your memory, or go on spirit journeys and learn how to forgive.

          It’s all in your head but that doesn’t make it any less real.

          Currency and democracy are ideas made manifest, and all they are is shared ideas in our heads.

          • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            What’s the point of using my mind to create something internal? It would be better if I could just twist reality with a thought. Smh.

            • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s complicated and if I fully explain it to you, it won’t work as well for you.

              Google ‘mind palace’ and start playing with the practice. It’s really just a fun imagination game that can actually improve your memory drastically.

    • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I recently had some guy rattle off 10 stupid reasons why we never landed on the moon in a row. I have never heard a more clear example of the fallacy of verbosity. One of them was "We didn’t have automatic windshield wipers for cars in the 60’s so there is no way we had the technology to go to the moon. "

      I swear to god his reasons were that stupid and he had a ton of them.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well it doesnt help that studies post covid restrictions found many of said restrictions where ineffective. Masks tho we have good evidance they work at least.

    • tastysnacks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Masks are more effective in protecting others if you are sick, rather than protecting yourself if others are sick. We should have the attitude that protecting others is good.

    • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      As always, it’s better to recommend more strict restrictions when you don’t know if they’re effective and there’s an impact on public health. Hindsight is 20/20

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know about other countries, but the on and off lockdowns in some countries proved to be ineffective. Many experts said it’s better to do lockdown in one go than it being staggered and having different levels of restrictions. But on the one hand, the totalitarian zero-COVID restriction like had happened in China is just as ineffictive.

        • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yep, the lockdown waves probably weren’t ideal for preventing viral spread, but we now know they were at least better than doing nothing.

          Hopefully we learn for next time

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    People act like their mamas never told 'em to cover their damned mouths when they cough or sneeze. It’s the same damned thing, only masks work much better at keeping your filthy germs from infecting other people.

    Common sense ain’t common, they say, and this anti-mask nonsense is just proof that it’s true.

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But don’t you know? Having symptoms like “drier mouth,” “fogged glasses,” and “smelling your own breath” are much more dangerous than a virus that killed a million Americans at least.

      What it really tells me it that the mouth breathers are crazier than we gave them credit for.

  • Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    And yet social distancing was “obvious” because scientists said it u til they admitted they pretty much just made that distance up.

    That’s why there’s an Appeal from Authority fallacy… But you just keep on trusting what ever they say with out questioning it.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They “made up” the arbitrary distance of 6 feet, not the entire concept of distance making it harder for germs to spread… What the hell failure of logic is that?! Some viruses can stay potent in air much better than others and they weren’t CONFIDANT that 6 feet would be adequate or overkill. It was an educated guess for COVID specifically, not an ass pulling.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It wasnt an educated guess it was just around 2 meters and felt good. I am not saying worked or not, but there was no science behind the number.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          There is a vast difference between doing something that is proven to be generally helpful before you know if it is specifically helpful, and making up an idea.

          The fact you cannot understand that vast gulf of difference is frankly hilarious.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            They had no idea if it would work or not and had no reason to believe either way. Do you believe in checking hypothesis?

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Do you think they didn’t or don’t continue with the new variants as budgets allow? Your ignorance is made more pathetic by your obstinance.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You do realize that social distancing does have a body of work around it and was used to mitigate the 1918 pandemic…

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Socializing your health care might destroy you guys, since there’s so many fatties, smokers, guns and people who ignore doctors. Sounds expensive.

      • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Smokers?! Have you ever been to France? It’s like a trip back in time to 80s America, with a smoker on every street corner and an ash tray on every cafe patio table.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ask the military industrial complex. Too much good applicable science and tech comes from space exploration.

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    You’re assuming these people believe we even send things to space. I had a serious ass conversation recently with my father’s roommate. Typical conspiracy theorist ding dong. Full on flat earther and everything. I asked him how he thinks GPS works if the earth was flat. He admitted he didn’t know but then when I started to explain how it works by pinging satellites we put up in space he cut me off and said space isn’t real. Like legitimately thinks space isn’t real. He on a separate occasion also complained that we didn’t need to wear masks during covid because we apparently make our own viruses in our bodies and viruses don’t spread between people.

    These people don’t even understand how logic works. Let alone that people could be smarter than they are.

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It probably didn’t help that at the beginning they said the cloth didn’t help, then changed the messaging later on.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The way I recall it seeing thing unfold and not really following the political stuff at the time:

      CDC said that cloth masks don’t stop viruses. You need a medical mask for that, but please don’t use those because hospitals need them. That was all true.

      In other countries, notably South Korea, almost everyone wore masks, and the numbers showed their effectiveness.

      So CDC realized that indeed, if everyone wears one, it greatly reduces transmission of the virus. It doesn’t have to be perfect to be efficient.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      IIRC, that initial “don’t use surgical masks” statement was because hospitals were already facing shortages, and a rush on the supply would have caused massive widespread longstanding shortages. Basically, the hospitals needed disposable masks, so the CDC told people not to use disposable masks.

      But it was also in that brief time period between surgical masks and reusable cloth masks. So the messaging was basically just “don’t use disposable masks” because the “disposable” part was implied because it’s all that was commonly available on the market. Plus cloth masks hadn’t been studied yet. So when cloth masks were proven to work and the CDC started recommending them, the naysayers fell back to that initial messaging from when the cloth masks were unavailable and unproven.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Just because there was an explanation doesn’t magically make it acceptable to lie out your ass and give a HUGE boost to conspiracy nuts while one fucking helms the white house…

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Are we really still pretending the mask I got from the front bin of Home Depot actually works?

    Can we look at the other claims the government “scientists” claimed to see how they were not real scientists?

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The cheap, dumpy masks are still going to somewhat reduce your intake of particles and significantly reduce your output, which is their main point.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thats great, but did they actually prevent spread is the question to ask. We can start out with the hypothesis that they do work, then we need to actually confirm if that is true.

        • braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          here. just the first two research results for a simple google search “did masks work research.”

          https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10446908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499874/

          i mean… you could look into it? know that it’s difficult to set up a statistically ideal study during a pandemic.

          edit - also, it’s hard to take you seriously in this debate when you aren’t bothering to ACTUALLY LOOK AT SOME RESEARCH yourself. but i see you making lots of comments making a show of concern.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            From all that I have seen and heard its at best split or the impact is so small that it is not noticeable. I think most of the ones that say it worked involved healthcare setting where trained people used good masks, not me at home depot with a mask from a box.

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              What I can say is that during the “mask years”, I seriously never got a cold, flu, or Covid. I usually get a cold at least once or twice a year. I think it’s still been a while since I’ve had one. My sister actually just got Covid about 2 weeks ago, I wore a mask around her for a few days and never caight it, tho I had a booster 6 months before, and she was about a year out. I took 3 home tests over 5 days and they were all negative.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Cool, I dont really know how this relates to the overall effectiveness of masks. I am going to guess that you were very cautious and took all kinds of precautions.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Someone that takes in data and comes to a data driven conclusion, not an ideological driven solution.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What? Yes? Home Depot sells N95 masks. Protection is why they exist.

      Are we really pretending this metal saw blade I got from the front bin of Home Depot actually cuts things? I’m skeptical.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most people didnt use N95 masks, they used random cloth ones and the surgical looking ones. The N95 masks are actually really good for dust, I use them all the time.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The issue here is that people pretended masks were very affective, and I have not seen any actual data that they were very useful. I have seen a lot of memes like the one above that pretend they were essential when the only data I ever recall seeing was they were overall 4% useful, by a pro-mask source. And if you look around there are lots of sources that said they did nothing, I dont know which is true, but lack of solid evidence seems to point to it was pointless.

        Do you think masks should have been mandated indoors if they had a 4% impact? How about 0.1%?

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Twentyish studies are sourced at the bottom of the article I linked, and it details the effectiveness of each mask type in the body of the article. Why we are discussing mandates now I don’t know, feels like a bit of the ol’ goalposts on wheels to me, it’s not what I replied to.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think this is the most important part of the article “Yes. When used with measures such as getting vaccinated, hand-washing and physical distancing, wearing a face mask slows how quickly the virus that causes COVID-19 spreads.” It essentially says do all the things and it will be impactful.

            At what level of impact do you think masks should have been forced on people?

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m not going to re-litigate mask mandates with you. I’m sure you’ll find someone happy to have that argument. You can keep moving those goalposts, but I’m not following.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                That was really the big question back in the day, and when I see spotty evidence at best for mandating something that really is the key question.