In the American sensibilities, the Democrats are left wing.

I know we’ve shat on Americans too many times that Democrats are not leftists and Republicans are far-right, but there is a place and time for doing so and I learned to cut Americans some slack. Americans simply have different Overton window because of different history and culture (I have explained before as to why, but I cannot be bothered to write another wall of text about it). Other countries don’t even follow a left and right political dichotomy. Many places, especially in developing countries, vote on personalities than policies. But few of us crap on people from developing countries for not following policy-based discourse, or not following the European-originated sensibilities of “left or right” politics.

This is the real joke.

Wait, what joke?

“Academia is being esoteric” or in other words “academia is a pompous twat”.

Isn’t that standard business practice so that you’d be able to promote your product? As well to improve?

It is worth mentioning that when the first stuffed sample of platypus was sent to Britain, the scientists thought it is a joke.

The alpha/beta wolf notion doesn’t even make much of a sense, considering wolves tend to be loners but only make packs when they need to hunt.

Ffs I hate PragerU. The website “All Sides Balanced” quotes them as if they are a reliable and genuine university that does research, when in fact it’s a right wing propaganda machine that spews the already derided laissez faire economics and climate change denialism.

*cosmic dread intensifies

How soon could this diagnostic tool be rolled out? It sounds very promising given the seriousness of the DCIS!

Ironic isn’t? The victims of fascism are now the fascists.

I swear quantum physics is magic and made up!

deleted by creator

*Usual five apps

1. Lemmy
2. Lemmy
3. Lemmy
4. Lemmy
5. Lemmy

You mean to tell me that industries sacrifice long term consequences for short term profit?!

shockes Pikachu face

Shush… if theists could read they’d be upset!

Not against you personally, but your premise sounds like a weak bothside-ism that justifies the cycle of violence. “He did first” kind of argument. “An eye for an eye makes us all blind.” as Ghandi put it.

The most rational and objective bothside advocacy is the two-state solution. It seems like the mainstream neglect this and does not think outside the box. I understand that there is so much bad blood between Palestinians and Israelis, but if both sides realise they are blinded by rage, they could emulate the Northern Ireland peace agreement that ended the 20 year cycle of violence between the Irish nationalists and British unionists. Many scholars and activists from both Israeli and Palestinian side advocate for two state solution and a Northern Ireland-style peace agreement. It is just a matter of ordinary people to look past the rage. Israel is there to stay and advocating to rid Israel is like trying abort a baby. And Israel stepping on Palestinians is repeating what the Nazis did to them and thus Israel could not claim the higher moral ground.

There has to be a united civilian will to accept that both sides are here to stay, like the Irish nationalists and British unionists have done. But both Israeli and Palestinian sides have internal divisions and many support their own radical groups representing their own beliefs.

Stealing my kills bro!

Aldaba rail: I’M BACK, BITCHES!

Climate change: You will get second KO.

Example of “living fossil”.

Wait until he/she finds out ancient Romans love to draw and talk about penises, and being vulgar about people they detest on their wall writings.

I reckon it was from the Middle Ages and the influence of Christianity that people became more uptight with anything that is seen in public.