• VubDapple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 month ago

    Many people do not grasp the sheer size of the disparity between the truly wealthy and everyone else.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most people will take “freedom” as an axiom, but how “freedom” is defined varies a lot. In a society where the commons are pretty much fully enclosed and you are homeless, the petite-bourgeois may very well be free, but you really aren’t.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Many don’t even do it intentionally, they just don’t grasp concepts like Historical and Dialectical Materialism, which requires reading lengthy books to fully grasp. They may be anti-Capitalist at heart, but without a solid understanding of theory they play into bourgeois hands.

    There’s also the fact that the ideas held by society are a reflection of the Mode of Production.

    • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Pretty sure they’d take everything you just wrote and say, “that sounds like critical race theory, which Jesus said was bad.”

  • AliSaket@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Many reasons. One major factor imho is the belief or illusion to be living in a meritocracy. Which would mean, that someone who’s rich has to have earned it and therefore criticism must stem from envy or jealousy. The same belief fuels the ideology of thinking of poor people to just be lazy leeches on society.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      The idea of meritocracy is such a bullshit lie it’s laughable. We need it so our children don’t live in a world without hope but much like santa claus they should shed the idea around the time of college. There are merit based reward systems. Ladder climbing is real. Only, many of them are corrupted by politics and mismanagement. Even if you succeed in an isolated merit based system it’s only to incentivize more production and you will never reach the level of CEO or what ever.

      What we should teach young adults is that life is a lottery inside a lottery inside a lottery. Success is about increasing your odds by taking as many smart bets as you can. Bets where the reward is great and where you don’t have much at stake if you lose. Betting with other people’s money is the most efficient way of extracting value. The meritocracy isn’t real, so neither is the morals around it. If you want nothing but an easy life this is how you do it. If your can’t in good conscious gamble with other people’s livelihoods we will see you on the ladder.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    temporarily embarrassed billionaires

    Richard Nixon’s head : I promise to cut taxes for the rich and use the poor as a cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel!

    [audience applauds]

    Philip J. Fry : That’ll show those poor!

    Turanga Leela : You’re not rich!

    Philip J. Fry : But someday I might be rich, and people like me better watch their step

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    30 days ago
    1. Because it’s in their personal interests to perpetuate capitalism
    2. Because liberal ideology is hegemonic and it is what most people have been raised to believe
    3. Plenty of other reasons why people hold the political beliefs they hold, surely it’s obvious that there are many ways that someone can arrive at a belief system
  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Unfortunately many of us have been taught that being a good person and a good citizen equals being productive and accumulating resources. Things that are quantifiable and external to the actual person and their relationships.

    Being productive and accumulating some resources can be good activities to spend time on, but they are practical necessities and not defining characteristics of existence.

  • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not because they think they can be billionaires, it’s because they’ve been taught (and in a minority of cases this is true) that they are better off going after the crumbs that billionaires leave them than trying some other system.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The Post apocalyptic nature of alot of media makes me think that people can more easily Imagine the fall of human civilization then we can a better world where everyone’s needs are met.

    To the 1%, losing all your wealth and power be an apocalypse, so it is in their best interests that everyone would be thinking the same as well. No matter how much better we all would be together otherwise.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think you know why. Is this a real question or are you just fishing?

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    We’re raised by parents that must be obeyed for our own safety. Some people eventually learn to accept their parents are imperfect people and not gods. Many people do not. They look to kings and gods to protect and provide for them.

    Those that have power negotiate with kings and gods. People without power attempt to use the only techniques they know to negotiate with their kings and gods: begging and/or pledging loyalty and service in exchange for scraps.

    Of course this is but one of many reasons many people worship power.

  • bricklove@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    I think it’s like the old trope of asking a fish how the water is and they reply “what’s water?”