Let’s you and him fight.

That’s fine among limeys, but I don’t think anyone else recognizes it.

Apple pie with (cheddar) cheese apparently was a New England staple in the 17th century, but I don’t know if anyone had it for breakfast.

A very old New Englander once to my girlfriend & me that we went together “like pie with cheese.” We had idea what to make of it.

Really it’s their team that should have been named the Yankees. And it would have paired well with the Patriots.

I took myself out of the lavender but never the lavender out of me.

I don’t know what to make of the “pie for breakfast” reference. Anyone?

Oh yeah. I’ve seen it written this way before and just aped it.

You can tell pretty much any LLM to talk like a pirate or write like a cop, etc. But using a local LLM (which this one is) is the way to go if you’re serious about anonymity.

but y tho, supernintendo chamlers?

My argument is that not liking China does not imply liking the US.

No claims it does, so who are you arguing with?

liberals not explaining the excruciatingly obvious to us challenge: impossible

Did you know that also:

• Only one thing can be bad.
• Only the other thing can be bad.
• Neither thing can be bad.

If you don’t have an argument, then don’t pretend to make one.

If you don’t believe there is a way through—even when you can’t yet see the light at the end of the tunnel—then there is no project.

If you don’t engage with the world as it really is, then you’ll sabotage your efforts to see the project through.

Black Skin, White Masks

No one believes US is lying about China and DPRK.

Then everyone is a sucker.

• We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
• The Mighty Wurlitzer
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_influence_on_public_opinion
• Previously

I guess I should have expected deflection and “appeal to hypocrisy” when naming authoritarians.

Can you be any more a Redditor?

This conversation has already been had out a thousand times here. You brought nothing new to the conversation—in fact you brought nothing—so I can’t be bothered.

But, you indirectly proved my point - authoritarians are belligerent.

That wasn’t a point you made, and that’s not what belligerent means in the context I used it.

Sarcasm is not an argument, and we do have evidence for every genocide in modern history, because it’s impossible to hide one.

Trump’s regime is like every tin-pot authoritarian ever. Lies about everything, hides losses, and makes up “victories”.

These are in no way specific to Trump or “authoritarians.” Many—probably most—belligerents do those things.

Same shit Putin, the Kim Jongs, or even Castro did.

https://lemmygrad.ml/c/alwaysthesamemap