I make the specification of non-linux because otherwise this would just become a thread full of obscure distros that do the same thing as a million other distros.

Some lesser known OSs:

  • AROS - based on Amiga OS, has some derivatives like IcarOS and MorphOS
  • Haiku - based on BeOS
  • Redox - Unix-like, made in Rust (might technically count as linux?)
  • Serenity - Unix-like, very late 90s look and feel
  • Kolibri - Tiny OS, the image is ~44MB. It also has a smaller version that fits in a single floppy.
  • PhantomOS - When 3 Russians decide to turn everything about a typical OS upside down.
  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    ReactOS. The “We have Windows at home” OS.

    Maybe then it will see proper development to become that which it should be.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I wish I would win top prize of some lottery, I’d donate a good deal of money to ReactOS and pray it finally developed enough to at least manage to make stable installer images

  • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Firefox OS. …really I just want Chrome OS but FOSS by Mozilla. I know it’s anti-privacy, but having sign-in + 1 click deployment on a new device is dope

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Haiku is already pretty great to use in my opinion, despite still being in beta; with the right hardware you could easily daily drive it

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Redox isn’t Linux, it uses its own kernel. I want this one to succeed above all others, just because Rust was born to perform this kind of application: guaranteed memory safety when dealing with tens of thousands of lines of code handling hundreds of moving parts running thousands of different tasks, all at a very low level.

    I’ll second Plan 9, just because it sounds like scifi and truly takes advantage of how interconnected all computing hardware has become.

    Third place goes to anything based on GNU Hurd. The microkernel architecture intrigues me, and I’d like to know how it effects the end user. Plus I’m just a big fan of the copyleft/FOSS aspect.

    Also, I’d just like any mobile device alternative that’s not AOSP, and Linux seems like a bad fit for mobile in general. Why do we need a fully-featured, all-purpose kernel when we’re only gonna put it on a known number of SoCs and therefore a known set of hardware configurations? We could be optimizing the hell out of our privacy-friendly mobile OSes, but instead we’ve shackled ourselves to google or linux

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    HURD, obviously.

    I’m happy with any OS as long as it’s GNU.

  • vortexal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    To name something that hasn’t been mentioned yet, ArcaOS, which based on OS/2. It supports modern hardware and in addition to some preinstalled software, it also has some compatibility layers to run software from other OSs.

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, I was going to say Haiku. It’s surprisingly capable for this day and age (although needs tonnnns of work)

  • maniii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wish Nokia N900 / N950 with Maemo or Meego OS. And full opensource, full MPL or MIT licensed.

    I truly wish SailfishOS could be that replacement but I’ve been burnt too many times already.