The monotheistic all powerful one.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Astley paradox.

    If you ask Rick Astley for his copy of Disney Pixar’s Up, he can’t give it to you, because he’ll never give you Up. But by not doing so, you’d be let down, and he’ll never let you down.

    Testing this scenario is ofc incredibly risky to the state of our reality, so the Astley paradox must remain a thought experiment.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    My favorite paradox is the “Stay signed in” option Microsoft gives you when signing in. Because despite keeping you signed in on every other site in existence, Microsoft, who is usually hooked into your OS, does not. Thus, stay signed in runs contradictory to one’s expectations.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Alanis morissette’s song ironic contains no solid cases of irony, mostly bad luck or poor timing, and is therefore ironic.

  • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like George Carlin’s version: “If God is all powerful, can he make a rock so big that he himself can’t lift it?”

  • esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    If there exists a place outside time, then the only way to travel there is to already be there, and if you are there, you can never leave.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I like Gödel numbering as a means of proving that it is impossible to have a complete model of logic.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fermi’s Paradox. There are so many stars (more than there are grains of sand on earth), that the probablility that one of them has life, and even intelligent life, is >99% . So why haven’t we observed it yet? Cue a lot of brilliant people trying to answer that question.

    • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The Dark Forest - no one wants to alert their presence or attract predators. Though knowing our Earth I think we’re stupid enough to do that. Cue the space lasers.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Seems like a smart move to stay silent.

        It could’ve also been knowledge interstellar species gained through experience too: if in their first encounters they were either wiped out, or nearly wiped out, then they’re not going to reach out again.

    • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The space is

      REALLY

      Fucking YUUUUUUGE

      What you observe of the universe died a really long time ago, it’s improbable that other intelligent life in the universe can observe us and the same with us.

      We could be multiple galaxies away from each other and never ever know of each other.

  • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The usual answer is yes, but he survives. Basically this isn’t a paradox for something actually all powerful.

  • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    In gridiron football, if a penalty is committed close enough to the end zone, instead of the normal penalty yardage, the ball is spotted half the distance to the goal (i.e. if a defender holds an offensive player and the offense is 8 yards away from the end zone, instead of being penalized the normal 10 yards they would be penalized 4). In theory, there can be an infinite amount of penalties to the point where penalties would move the ball micrometers or even shorter without the ball ever crossing the end zone.

    There’s probably a name for this phenomenon, but I can’t think of it.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think Nietzsche already killed god decades ago. But not sure which one.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    In classical logic, trichotomy on the reals (any given numbers is either >0, <0 or =0) is provably true; in intuitionistic logic it is probably false. Thanks to Godel’s incompleteness theorem, we’ll never know which is right!

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why is “can god kill god” a paradox? They either can or they can’t (picking “they” because your particular god might not be a he). If they’re all-powerful then the answer is yes, because they can do anything. I don’t see how that’s paradoxical.