• 331 Posts
  • 932 Comments
Joined 7 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 17th, 2019

help-circle









  • So much coded language in here.

    libspeak converted
    “Bombs have yet to create enduring democracies” “The Iranians must accept our superior yanqui form of goverment where the rich control everything, and bombs aren’t the right way to accomplish that.”
    “The american people”, “american casualties” “The lives of US storm-troops are more important than the civilians of the Iran”
    “violence begets violence” “God forbid these Iranians defend themselves and start killing our imperial troops!”
    “This war is unlawful”, “Uphold our constitution” “The sacred slaveholder-written documents which founded the US empire must be preserved, and we should only make war if it passes through congress like Iraq”
    “aimless war” “I don’t understand the causes, history, or why the US benefits from exerting its power in the ME / persia, so it seems aimless to me”





  • Means we can’t effectively “live a pleasurable life / gather roses while we can in this life”, because the next lives downstream will keep experiencing suffering just like we do, and it multiplies to infinity, unless we do something in this life to escape suffering.

    Even if you don’t believe in rebirth, it’s hard to deny that it does give a good impetus and sense of urgency that gets us to look beyond our own existence.







  • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlSign check
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Both Mao and Deng era’s both had foreign investment, and high growth rates compared to capitalist countries.

    Both are still built on the foundation of socialism: 5 year plans, no private land ownership, public ownership commanding the heights of the economy, and a smaller capitalist sector for foreign investment.

    From 1949-1978, the Mao Era, China’s GDP grew an average of 7% per annum. Mao sincerely wanted the Chinese to get rich, just that all that wealth must be distributed as equally as possible. This is reflected in China’s 1978 GINI coefficient being a very egalitarian 0.16. A GINI coefficient of zero means that all the income is evenly distributed to all citizens and a coefficient of one means one person has all the income and everybody else has nothing. As a comparison, Sweden’s is currently 0.25, the lowest in the world, China’s is 0.37, the US’s is 0.41 and for all of humanity, 0.65. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient

    With the advent of Deng Xiaoping’s reforms and opening up China’s economy to do battle with Western capitalism(the Deng Era, 1979-2012), China’s economy has grown an average of 10% per annum, while America’s growth averaged 6%. A not-well-known point of history is that many of Deng’s reforms were actually started by Mao, Deng and Zhou Enlai, going back into the 70s and 60s, which helps explain the Mao Era’s phenomenal socioeconomic achievements. These earlier reforms were cleverly rebranded as “new” by Deng. Western capitalists eagerly lapped it up, in their lustful pursuit of Chinese profits, starting in 1978.

    These imperial lies have continued into the Deng Era. China is still a communist and socialist country. Baba Beijing has simply used the West’s methods, markets, investment and technology to continue to advance the wellbeing of China’s people, within its non-capitalist economy. This is hard for most Westerners to wrap their heads around, that China has been and continues to be a communist and socialist country, till now, 2015, and will continue to be so as long as Baba Beijing is in power. This explains why the West has been relentlessly trying to overthrow the Communist Party of China (CPC), since liberation in 1949.



  • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlSign check
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    PRC, USSR, Cuba, Vietnam, DPRK. All succeeded where others failed in defeating western colonialist attempts, and lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.

    PRC deserves special recognition for lifting more people out of poverty in the past 30 years than any other country in history… so much so that world poverty is increasing if we leave it out.



  • Either that, or for chinese android OEMs to just refuse this. I have a Xiaomi android tablet where google play is entirely optional, and it doesn’t require any developer verification, and I greatly doubt they’d let google refuse to let them use their own app stores.

    I made an issue on the keepandroidopen repo about a "remove my app from google play pledge at least.