Neo Mujico
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

Boxers or Briefs?

message-square
message-square
17
fedilink
27
message-square

Boxers or Briefs?

wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
17
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boxerbriefs.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the way.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      These. Get some have that special dividers or pouches for extra comfort. So cozy.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Boxerbrief gang.

    • Aurelian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boxerbriefs. Boxers just bunch up.

  • KlavKalashj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Briefs, absolutely. The boxer trend is ridiculous. It’s getting hard finding briefs here at all, in Sweden. Imo, it all stems from middle school insecurity. We were all told briefs were gay and so now everyone is using boxers.

    • portifornia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh that’s interesting! Locally in the US I’m always noticing the opposite: it’s all briefs or boxer-briefs, rarely boxers.

  • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Briefs. Actual support. The singular function underwear has.

    Boxers are just commando with extra steps. Utterly pointless.

    I consider all enlightened boxer brief centrists to be strictly in the briefs camp as boxer briefs are just briefs with leg extensions.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes.

  • tuto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    brezhoneg
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boxer-briefs 100%

  • ReallyZen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    jockstraps

    unparallel support, minimal heat buildup, max freedom

  • MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Commando 100%

    • bushvin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Joey, is that you?

  • RobotServo81 he/him@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Briefs absolutely, hate boxers because of rolling and bunching.

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Briefs all the way. I have to have separation between my balls and thighs, it’s way too annoying and uncomfortable for me to have them stick to my leg.

    Also I need to lose some weight, cause my thighs rub together when I walk, and briefs help make that more comfortable.

  • t�m@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends on the weather

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boxer briefs.

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

  • !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • !fediverse@lemmy.ml
  • !selfhosted@lemmy.world

Looking for a community?

  • Lemmyverse: community search
  • sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
  • !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 187 users / day
  • 775 users / week
  • 1.9K users / month
  • 6.81K users / 6 months
  • 5 local subscribers
  • 49.2K subscribers
  • 2.79K Posts
  • 39.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan@lemmy.ml
  • mekhos@lemmy.ml
  • Tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org