• paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pokemon Sword and Shield.

    Rose is trying to move the country off of fossil fuels and onto sustainable green energy. Somehow Gamefreak manages to portray this as being a terrorist and extremist. How dare he try to move Galar away from coal?

    • Karu 🐲@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, he did recreate a cataclysmic event in the process, and the projected crisis was bound to happen in 1000 years… One can never be too prepared I guess.

      What is that even trying to say? That there is such thing as going too far when fighting the energy crisis? lol

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Voyager kinda fucks with my ability to set spoiler tags, so here is your Spoiler Warning.

    The Cabin in the Woods (even tho the organisation is run by complete assholes, they also happen to postpone the end of the word)

    Mass Effect series (the Geth are actually ok having peace with everyone. They just happen to be in a civil war with Reaper worshippers)

    Witcher 2 (Letho turns out to be the good guy)

    Wanted (the father turns out to be the good guy)

    Battlestar Galactica 2004 series (yes, the Cylons enacted the nuclear holocaust on humanity, but there is a case to be made that the vast majority of them have been manipulated by a faction of ancient Cylons, which leads to a civil war later in the show)

    • jeremyparker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Cylons being manipulated by other cylons doesn’t absolve them of guilt.

      BSG did have a few instances of the reverse of OP’s question tho – where the “good guys” turned out to be bad" – trying to say this without spoilers; it’s a 20 year old show but ffs of you haven’t seen it, go see it now.

      • the (temporary) new admiral
      • several main characters during the part where they live on the dirty planet
      • a very specific set of seven main characters (wink wink) … .and more,…

      And there’s one specific example of the full 360 – a character that starts good, turns bad, but turns out they were actually good all along. I won’t give the name, but they were passing messages to the resistance.

      That show was awesome.

      One note tho, on the topic generally: flipping character alignments is a frequent pre-shark-jump thing, and is often bad writing. In BSG, tho, all of the “flips” are pre-planned, or at least 100% true to their character (eg the 360 example above).

      • rustyfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        BSG is one of the best shows I have ever watched and not a single twist came across as forced or unnatural.

        If I think about that I started watching it years after it was made and only started because I was bored out of my mind at that time. I could have missed it so easily.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        He doesn’t “turn bad”. He’s good all along, but he’s a target of a witch hunt, understandably gets jaded by it and gets absolved at the last moment. It’s the judging commission or however they called themselves who are the bad guys there. Gaeta is innocent all along, even if he is annoying at times.

        • jeremyparker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re right, I’ll concede that – but only because BSG is an amazing show and very few characters can be reduced to “good” and “bad” – even the “antagonists” (in the traditional sense of those characters working against the stories’ progression) have pretty valid reasons for doing what they do.

          Gaius (sp?) is one of the closest characters to “bad” – but not because of the bad things he does, but because of the bad things he is – ie, vain, selfish, etc – and the fact that he lets those negative characteristics drive his actions.

          All the characters have flaws, but the “good” characters do their best to mitigate their flaws, and let their positive traits motivate them. For example, Adama often acts before he thinks, a trait that is awesome in combat, but can be less positive other times – and he (as best he can) seeks advice and counsel from the people he trusts (eg Saul Tigh) – he knows he can be impulsive and he knows his “instant judgement” decision making isn’t perfect.

          Cavil (that’s his name I think) is close to “evil” but he does have reasons for his actions – preservation of his “species” (though really it’s just himself) – but he’s evil because of the fact that he doesn’t listen and acts with disloyalty and dishonor.

          (There’s an amazing comeuppance for the titular character of the show Nathan Barley that epitomizes this idea: Barley doesn’t actually do anything wrong, but his motivations are repugnant, and his motivations are what’s revealed… Shit I should write a whole essay on that…)

          Are there contemporary shows that are as good as BSG? I kind of gave up on TV after Firefly.

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Jerry antagonized Tom into attacking him more often than not. He viewed it as a game rather than a life or death struggle. Tom OTOH would be kicked out on the street if he didn’t try to keep Jerry under control.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I bet its that Jerry has that toxoplasmosis making him unafraid of cats. In that light, nobody’s at fault. Its just nature shit happening to play out in the domestic sphere

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Kill la Kill, at least with the primary antagonist as the main villain isn’t really introduced until pretty late in the story.

    • emptyother@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I cant see Ozymandias as a good guy. At all. None of the “heroes” are, but Oz was the worst of them.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        In the movie the only one I would’ve considered good was Rorschach. He was the only one who only made personal sacrifices to save people.

        I mean dude legit let himself be killed because he couldn’t live with not telling the world what Ozymandius actually did.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Rorschach being good is debatable, he’s a Batman like vigilante who hasn’t the ‘no killing’ rule, which is dubious.

          But the reason he chose death was (in my humble opinion) that he realized Veidt had found the solution, that would bring peace and create a world he would be useless in.

          This point is made by the ultra nationalist frontiersman publication he sent his diary to. They complain that they have nothing to write about as the world was united in boring peace, this is when the burger munching intern gets the assignment to pull something out of the loonie pile.

    • The_wild_card@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah ozymandies was kind of an ass regardless . Did he solve a big problem ? Yes . Was he a good guy ? Far from it.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I bought the book just this weekend. Until now I only watched the movie. Looking forward to reading it!

  • The French version of La Femme Nikita, although it’s more of a redemption arc than “villain turning out to be a good guy.” She starts out as a junkie petty crook who murders a cop in cold blood, spends most of the film assassinating people for the government, and in the end seems to have gotten her life together.

    But she starts out as a very not-nice person.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would say that Lex Luthor is more of a villain who sees himself as the good guy. He thinks he is humanity’s savior from what he perceives as an alien threat. Whether he is evil or not depends on the actions of Superman.

      • impudentmortal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s been a while since I’ve seen the film, but I’d say both.

        Rooney just wanted proof that Ferris was skipping school, which he was. He went about it the wrong way by entering the Bueller household but he was basically just trying to do his job. He definitely gets obsessive about it but he’s not in the wrong.

        Jeanie is pretty self explanatory. She also just wants Ferris to suffer the consequences of his actions.

        I think this movie never sat well with me because Ferris obviously does so many wrong and criminal things but is actually rewarded for it. Sure, you should take the time to enjoy life but not at the expense of others.

  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Does borderlands count?

    !handsome jack started off as an honorable person with morals, but was repeatedly stabbed in the back and jaded over time. He still has the mindset of a good guy but the chaotic planning of a bad guy due to the experiences that he’s had.!<