Marx for sure. Gotta be the most misunderstood and purposefully distorted writer I have seen
For real. Lenin’s introduction to The State and Revolution is evergreen:
What is now happening to Marx’s teaching has, in the course of history, happened repeatedly to the teachings of revolutionary thinkers and leaders of oppressed classes struggling for emancipation. During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their teachings with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to surround their names with a certain halo for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time emasculating the essence of the revolutionary teaching, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it. At the present time, the bourgeoisie and the opportunists within the working-class movement concur in this “doctoring” of Marxism. They omit, obliterate and distort the revolutionary side of this teaching, its revolutionary soul. They push to the foreground and extol what is or seems acceptable to the bourgeoisie. All the social-chauvinists are now “Marxists” (don’t laugh!). And more and more frequently, German bourgeois scholars, but yesterday specialists in the annihilation of Marxism, are speaking of the “national-German” Marx, who, they aver, educated the workers’ unions which are so splendidly organized for the purpose of conducting a predatory war!
State and revolution was the first real theory I read. Quite the introduction
Certainly a banger way to start! I think it’s easier to appreciate after having read Marx and Engels prior to it, but Lenin is so fiery and darn smarmy with his writing that it’s hard not to love the guy, and State and Revolution in particular is a classic for good reason.
I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy. — Not Karl Marx
Socrates.
This man upheld his right to think his own thoughts and to go where the evidence led him. He stood trial and was sentenced to death.
Now, the most powerful people do not think, have zero principles, disregard evidence, and would gladly have others die to secure their power.
Socrates was executed for being super annoying.
How annoying is it to have idiotic anti-intellectuals running nuclear superpowers?
-Karl Marx: his ideology, that intended to fight oppression, was only used to build dictatorships.
-Martin Luther King: institutionalized racism is still alive and well.
-Marsha P. Johnson: the current situation of american queer -and especially trans- people in America is self explanatory.
John Brown has been writhing and spinning (and mouldering) in his grave for a very long time. Vengeful Wraith of John Brown for President!
George Washington. He would be rolling for so many different things. Political parties existing, America becoming the new british empire basically, black people having rights, the fact he wasnt alive to get modern dental care, non-landowners being able to vote, women being able to vote, etc
I was going to say George Washington with the direction the US is going he’d be pissed
But someone else said Jesus Christ, so yeah I think I’ll go with Jesus
I think he had a pretty good run, tbh.
Alexander Hamilton.
Probably William Thomson after his body started breaking the laws of thermodynamics like that.
Hiraga Gennai.
