For me, when I get books I often get the cheaper paperback option, give it a read.

Then if I really liked this book, I’ll donate it to a charity shop or in my social circle and purchase the hardcover version.

The only gripe I have with hardcover though is some books come with that sleeve cover around it, you know the one, bit fidgety to use when reading.

Paperback I like if there’s a book I am mildly interested in and I’ll just go “whatever” I’ll keep it as part a collection.

Paperbacks = cheap as chips but aren’t as protected as hardcover, easy to fill up your collection or shelf with, might sell it if i want the luxurious version of that book. this is for me.

Hardcover = More luxurious as it provides proper protection to the pages and outer area of the book, Often comes with items as part of a collectors set. Usually I get the same book if I really enjoy it to add as a gem of my shelf.

What are your tastes? Same as me or do you lean more heavily to one or the other?

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like paperback for reading, such as novels or whatever book I’ll be holding for an extended period of time.

    In contrast I prefer hardcover for books that are more visual in content or that are made to be consulted briefly such as encyclopaedias, dictionaries, etc. Or if I want it to stay open and flat on a surface, hardcover.

    I’m ambivalent about small/medium sized gift books or trinket books. Those can be whatever type of cover.

  • afox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Old ass musty smelling paperback. 50’s and old racist 60’s sci-fi books smell best. I have a problem.

  • kaitco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Kindle.

    ADHD usually means that I’ll stop mid-word and want to read something else. If I have all my books in one place, I can still sit in my comfy chair and switch, instead of wasting further hours perusing my library and getting lost in memories of acquiring each book.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ebooks all the way. An eink e-reader is delightful and ever since I got a Pixel Fold I like to read on that even though it’s not eink (Now if I could get a foldy eink e-reader I would be sooo happy!) because I can hold it like a physical book.

    Plus, you just can’t compete with being able to bring an entire library with you and the physical space savings for storage in general

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only time I prefer physical books to ebooks is when there’s a heavy focus on maps, diagrams, or other illustrations. In those cases I generally want the physical book to be as large as possible, which usually means hardcover.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I find paperbacks more comfortable. Though I have just bought a Kobo so I’ll probably be using that more soon.

  • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not a big difference really.

    I have most of the classics in paperback. Hardcovers do come out first, so if you’re in a hurry to read something new, that’s there first.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Paperback. For big books maybe hardcover so it stays in one piece, but tbh all the 1000+ page books I have are still paperbacks. Even if they were the same price, I think paperbacks are easier to hold and read since they’re more flexible. But the sturdiness of hardbacks can be nice sometimes

  • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Personally I’d like me some blend between paperback and hardcover.

    Paperbacks can be laid flat (but damage quickly), hardcovers not as easily (but don’t damage quickly).

    Something like a concealed Cased-in-Wire-O might be best, but where you don’t really see the spirals between the pages.

  • sga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    PDFs

    I know it was implied to be physical book, I usually read academic stuff, and having ability to select stuff and searching, dark theming, and ability to carry my older almost closet full of books, in something like 100-200 MBs of PDFs is just great. There are times when I actually had physical books, I would scan and ocr if i could not find a digital copy from the 7 seas.

    When I actually would get stuff, Hardcover (preferably jacketted) because they were thick (like 400-1400 pages thick) and not having hardcover meant the covers would have a half life of something like 50 uses, maybe less, or atleast it would get stained.

  • TheV2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I always choose hardcover. I try to keep the number of my owned physical books low. So when I do buy it, I want my eyes to be satisfied and they prefer the looks of hardcover. Since I usually buy secondhand books, overall it’s very cheap (although I don’t have high standards on the book’s condition).