• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Biden is well past his prime, had a shitty performance last night, hate his record on Israel, but I’m still voting for him because he’s not Trump and I’d prefer that our representative democracy continued. Moving to a braindead, functionally illiterate dictatorship just seems like an all-around worse move in every respect. Not sure about his chances, but whatever, there’s not really any other alternative at this point.

    • postgeographix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      82
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not American, and hate Trump and Biden equally. I say vote Trump. He’s the slim shady of US politics - he’s only giving you things you say with your friends inside of your living room, the only difference is he’s got the balls to say it in front of you all and don’t have to sugar coat it at all.

      So instead of avoiding your discomfort of acknowledging what the US is, just vote trump and let it be clear to everyone

      Or not. It doesn’t matter what you do, Trump is winning anyway. You guys are going to have cheetos man for president whether you, or we, like it or not.

      • jprice@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yea the things my family who likes him says in the living room is mostly ignorant compilations of how they think the government works and dumb white trash racist garbage so no thanks.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean with sweep generalizations like that you’d fit right in with the MAGA crowd, no wonder you like trump lol.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        he’s only giving you things you say with your friends inside of your living room, the only difference is he’s got the balls to say it in front of you all and don’t have to sugar coat it at all.

        Things like what, exactly? We must be hanging out in different living rooms.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yah fun things to talk about like “hey, isn’t it interesting how you have less medical rights now.” Jfc

    • StaySquared@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      110
      ·
      3 months ago

      Can you tell me what makes you believe that Trump is or will be a dictator? Don’t use Jan 6th.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can waste my time going through that exercise, but it’s pretty clear to any thinking person that that’s what the plan is on the Republican side, just look at the words, rhetoric and actions they’ve been taking for the past 10+ years. Otherwise, you’re maliciously asking me to go through the mental effort of writing up an attack on Trump that you’ve already decided to ignore and/or counter with some feeble bad faith argument. You’re a waste of my time and everybody else’s.

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          54
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah okay… so you’re full of chit as per usual. Let me guess, Maddow is your favorite all-time commentator?

          • paddirn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why don’t YOU go ahead and write me up a 2-page essay on why Trump isn’t planning a dictatorship, cite your sources. That’s essentially what you’re asking me to do and it’s guaranteed you’ll give a short, flippant remark that doesn’t actually address any of the issues brought up, basically wasting my time. It’ll be a bunch of whataboutism, gaslighting, misdirection, and BS, that’s the standard MO.

              • takeda@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Constitution only matters if it is being enforced. And 2017-2020 showed us that very few Republicans were willing to do that.

                Currently SCOTUS is debating whether president has absolute immunity (in other words, if he can commit any crime, including murdering his political opponents) something that is absolutely against our constitution, yet they have to debate it.

      • Jaderick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        If inciting an attack on the capital and destabilizing the worlds oldest democracy doesn’t immediately discount Trump from your voting decisions then you’re braindead lol. Imagine trying to argue past that, despite 9 years of existing with Trump as a political figure.

          • Jaderick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You right lmaooo. That’s funny, I guess I should say oldest democracy with real world power.

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          3 months ago

          Have you been paying attention to the details of Jan 6th? So far it looks like it was a setup, completely out of Trump’s control.

          Before you respond, have you been paying attention to the details of Jan 6th?

          • Triteer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The details like Trump saying he loved the insurrectionists? Yeah, I paid attention to that.

          • Jaderick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lmao. Cite them sources or me saying Trump blows maggoty cum all over Melania is literally as true as that statement.

          • takeda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, sure. And what prompted trump to show up in DC in January 6th, which before 2021 was day that didn’t have any special meaning in US history?

      • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        3 months ago

        Don’t use the time he instigated a coupe attempt as a reason?

        Can you tell me why putting my hand on an electric burner that is red hot is a bad idea? Don’t use anyone’s past experiences being burned by hot objects.

        Sure you could technically go into a complex explanation using physics as to why it’s a bad idea, but why?

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          3 months ago

          My defense is the U.S. Constitution. I don’t see it as even a possibility that anyone would attempt to become a dictator in the U.S.

          • slickgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            The constitution is decided by the Supreme Court in the end. The American system of government makes the selection of justices political appointees for life. That is why you have Republican and Democrat justices. Political. So the constitution gets bent into any political shape according to power possession.

            Don’t for a second believe that the United States can’t sleepwalk into a dictatorship. People are already describing Jan 6 as an ordinary tourist visit. What will it take for the public to see the danger with their own eyes.

          • takeda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I highly recommend “On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century” by historian Timothy Snyder If you can’t get a book or audio book the author also reads it on YouTube.

          • It can absolutely happen. Nothing stopping a republic from becoming a dictatorship. If it happened once in history, it will happen again. This thing in particular has happened multiple times. The US may show more resilience but in the end, it is a human system run by humans, and it will be broken by humans.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        So - ignoring the time he sent a mob to try and overthrow the US government, how about we use the fact that he literally said he’d be a dictator?

        Or maybe the fact that his legal defense against trying to overthrow the government was that the President is immune from all crimes. His lawyers even literally said he could have his political opponents murdered, and so long as the surviving politicians don’t impeach and convict him he can’t be held liable for it.

        They’re arguing a legal framework under which he can murder the opposition, and then kill anyone that tries to remove him from office.

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago
        1. He has said he plans on being a dictator for day one.
        2. He regularly talks like a dictator jailing and killing his political opponents.
        3. Even if he were to win a second term, he is to egotistical to let it go a second time.
        4. Hes putins little bitch who looks up to him, so of course he would want to be as great as the greatestness of putin.
        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          He has said he plans on being a dictator for day one.

          Source?

          He regularly talks like a dictator jailing and killing his political opponents.

          This is literally Biden and Co… This includes Obama and Hilary. Obviously you have a source for this too, right? Surely you have literal videos of his speeches/rallies where he speaks like a dictator announcing he’s going to jail and or kill his political opponents.

          Personally, when Trump wins, I think he should definitely pull a Bukele and have all politicians on all sides investigated for corruption, including the DOJ, the FBI, and the CIA.

          Hes putins little bitch who looks up to him, so of course he would want to be as great as the greatestness of putin.

          Russia-gate is and was all BS… If you’re referring to that. Trump’s commentary of Putin was really no different than Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Also, the cold war is over. Hating Russia today just because politicians do, is mindless drone territory.

          • Apollo42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            mindless drone territory

            The only part of this you seem qualified to weigh in on.

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ohh… I thought you meant from day one.

          Yeah, I wish I was God for 1 day. Lots of cleaning up to do.

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        He told Hannity he would be dictator for one day. No dictator goes one day. One is too many to begin with.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lol at supposedly asking an open question, while simultaneously stipulating that the open rebellion cannot be mentioned. That’s not how open questions work.

  • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Trump would only win if the Democrat party found someone seemingly more inept than him.

    I am impressed that the Democrat party managed to present not one, but two outstandingly incompetent candidates. In a row. That’s some bottom of the barrel advanced scraping techniques right there. They even managed to get a representation of both sexes.

    I’m sure Mr. Biden will be terribly distraught, as soon as he is able to understand what’s happening around him at the moment.

    • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The Democrats are still stuck in this post-Clinton seniority mindset where they unofficially pick a candidate before primaries even begin, based on who has been around the longest and who has held the highest position. Remember “it’s her turn”? Yes, yes, I know it didn’t work against Obama, but heading into the debates everyone assumed Hillary would be the candidate until Obama put on the better show. More to the point, I think Obama breaking through scared the establishment Dems into doubling down on primary fuckery. See what happened to Bernie, twice. So now we have a president who knows all the right people but plays politics with the 1990s rulebook and has a terminal case of crusty old man voice.

      Still better than Trump.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is about a succinct of a deconstruction of the DNCs hand in this cycle as I’ve seen. They’re effectively Ned Stark

    • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seriously though, I don’t follow American electoral politics much, but why didn’t they swap him out for someone else? It’s a country of ~330m people. Like even the likes of Blinken would have been acceptable to them surely? What’s the actual reasoning?

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s some stupid adherence to precedent where we don’t primary an encumbant because in the past it didn’t work out well. So now we shut our eyes and pretend he isn’t absolutely one of the worst candidates ever because we refuse to primary him.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      No. We’re “un-fucked”.

      We cant win with Biden.

      We CAN win without him.

      Finally the dense mother fuckers who have been denying Biden’s inadequacy have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into reality.

      We’ll have a brokered convention (like all conventions before 1970’s), we’ll get “generic corporate democrat”, and they’ll be instantly polling in the low to mid 50’s and we’ll actually have a fucking chance.

      Biden has had no chance at winning this election at any point in his candidacy. Ever. Look at the polling. Look at the data. He’s never stood a chance and plenty of people here and elsewhere have been trying to get this through some extremely thick skulls that have basically been insisting that we need to run an un-electable candidate.

      Well the goose is cooked. The rat is out of the bag. Here comes the moose or whatever. He’s done. Adios Biden, don’t let the door hit you on the way out. You did fine on some stuff but wow you fucked up on Gaza/Israel.

      Minutes after that debate Newsom was on MSNBC. We’re gonna get Newsom, or maybe Inslee; a way smarter choice would be Witmer or Andy Beshear.

      And guess what? Litterally ANY GENERIC CANDIDATE PUTS 10 POINTS BACK ON THE BOARD.

      Bam. Switch candidates and Democrats are instantaneously back in this race.

      • Xhieron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This probably doesn’t work, and it’s probably not as good idea as anyone hopes (genuinely or not). It might happen anyway, but no matter what, we’re coasting toward a second Trump presidency, just like all the Russian agitprops here wanted all along.

        If Biden is polling down 10 points or worse at the convention, they could drag someone else onto the stage, but my suspicion is that no one else outperforms him on short notice, even after his abysmal performance in the debate.

        A few reasons:

        1. Newsom probably doesn’t want it. If he calculates Trump wins either way (not unreasonable), he’s not going to want that loss on his record since he’s already gunning for 28. He would be the best chance at getting an up-and-comer who already has good name recognition and looks and sounds good.
        2. Harris. If Harris wants it, she has a lot of leverage to make it hard or outright impossible for the party to push anyone else out in front of her. She’s a poor candidate for a lot of reasons, but she’s also the most attached to Biden. That’s both good and bad for her. If they want to run anyone else, they have to have her playing ball too. Ask yourself, if you were Kamala Harris, would you give up your only conceivable chance at the Oval in favor of another non-Biden candidate? Remember, in any scenario the odds are good Trump wins anyway.
        3. The truth may be that the party would rather just let Trump win. That sounds unthinkable, but this isn’t a secret cabal of idealists we’re talking about: it’s a bunch of self-interested rich people who want to put themselves in power. Getting them to do anything for the public good is difficult under the best circumstances. They could easily decide–rightly–that Biden is still their best shot at beating Trump. That was the call in 2020, and it paid off. Don’t forget that many of these same names being batted around now were active in the party four years ago. Newsom loses to Trump, and he’s largely seen as the best alternative. If you’re running the party and looking at those odds, you should run Biden if you actually want the best chance at winning. You might decide it’s just a lost cause and start planning for a four year long nightmare.
        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Newsom probably doesn’t want it. If he calculates Trump wins either way (not unreasonable), he’s not going to want that loss on his record since he’s already gunning for 28. He would be the best chance at getting an up-and-comer who already has good name recognition and looks and sounds good.

          Bro Newsom was on MSNBC 15 seconds after the debate ended. Newsom is 100% gunning for the job.

          Harris. If Harris wants it, she has a lot of leverage to make it hard or outright impossible for the party to push anyone else out in front of her. She’s a poor candidate for a lot of reasons, but she’s also the most attached to Biden. That’s both good and bad for her. If they want to run anyone else, they have to have her playing ball too. Ask yourself, if you were Kamala Harris, would you give up your only conceivable chance at the Oval in favor of another non-Biden candidate? Remember, in any scenario the odds are good Trump wins anyway.

          This is a real issue that I think you are right to bring up. Harris can basically put the brakes on/ gatekeep whomever the nominee is going to be.

          If you’re running the party and looking at those odds, you should run Biden if you actually want the best chance at winning.

          Yeah you are just wildly off base here. Biden was at between a 5-20% chance of winning the election prior to this debate (not polling, but probability). He’ll be in the 3-10% range after this. Did you watch the post debate coverage? CNN’s only topic of conversation was that we need to replace Biden. This is CNN! They are the party insiders. He’s cooked.

          • Xhieron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Newsom was on MSNBC singing Joe’s praises, just like he would have done regardless, because Newsom wants to be president, but Newsom also polls worse than Biden. That’s not hypothetical. Those polls already exist, and a drop in Biden’s numbers isn’t automatically a boost for Newsom. If Newsom thinks losing in 24 hurts his viability in 28, he wouldn’t do it. And who could blame him? It’s five months to the election.

            The point is: It’s possible that all of the options are bad. Biden was in the mid-forties before the debate and the thirties after. He went from near toss-up to probably losing if the election were yesterday/today. Newsom might out-poll Biden today, but that’s not the contest.

            The contest is with Trump. It’s not good enough to poll better than Biden. You have to actually carry all of Biden’s states and then some. If I’m Newsom and deciding whether to try to cobble together a five-month campaign and limp to November to save the DNC from itself and protect Amtrak Joe’s legacy when I’m starting 15 points in the hole or run my own campaign against the likes of a Haley or DeSantis also-ran once Trump is term-barred, dead, or both in four years, I’m not taking a risk at the convention unless someone makes me very, very confident that I could win.

            And there’s the rub. Newsom wants to be president, and he’d love to be president in six months, but he’s not going to take over a campaign that’s already lost. If the party thinks Trump wins no matter what–not an unreasonable conclusion–why on earth would they burn their best shot of a rebound in 28?

              • Xhieron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Uh… okay, bro. You know that Donald Trump is also running in this election, right? Biden could be running single digits, and it still wouldn’t change the calculus: If a Biden alternative can’t beat Trump, they’re not going to put an albatross around the neck of their political career just to lose in November.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You’ve got the entire thing backwards: Biden is the albatross.

                  ANY other democrat polls better than Biden. Biden is the worst possible democrat to be running. Period. Except maybe Hillary, and even then, she’d be doing better than Biden right now.

                  You swap out Biden with literally any hollow blue suit, and you are suddenly 10 points up in the polls.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Good luck with Project 2025, because that’s what third party voters are voting for.

        We need to get rid of FPTP voting before a 2 party system can be derailed.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Are you like, actually touched?

          We’re talking about the Democratic nominee right now. Not any third party candidate.

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Biden is the Democratic nominee. Sure it’s not official until August 19-22 but unless he resigns, dies, or is otherwise fully incapacitated before then, he is the candidate who will be on the ballots in November. None of those possibilities seem likely.

          • PunnyName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Are you? Because people are still thinking about voting third party. Despite the fact that the system in place will not allow a third party candidate to prevail. And voting third party takes away from the Democratic party vote every time.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your party (Democrat) is peppered with bad elements for the U.S. (Marxist, Socialist, Communist etc…). You mentioned a staunch communist, Newsom. Look at the disaster he made California into. The droves of companies and citizens leaving or have left California. The silly penalty he plans to implement for Californian residents who leave the state (he’s wants to tax all Californians for a set of years if they leave California). The number of businesses that closed, not just from the stupid minimum wage hike but also from the amount of crime in and around the businesses.

        The fact that you mentioned Witmer makes me cringe… a neoliberal socialist.

        Andy Beshear is the only Dem (to my knowledge) that appears to be moderate. But I have very limited knowledge of his views/goals/accomplishments. He doesn’t come off as a neoliberal or crazy leftisms… yet. He has a bias for Israel which more than likely means he’s corrupted by AIPAC.

        Don’t get me wrong, the Republicans are also chitty. Thomas Massie and Rand Paul are two representatives with integrity. The others in the spotlight are chit tier.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Your Overton Window has fell off the side of the building and broken on the pavement.

          • StaySquared@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            You don’t even know my political views. Here’s a tidbit, tho; I dislike democracy/mob rule. It is easily corruptible/manipulatable.

            • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You don’t even know my political views

              The fact you’re so low IQ you think clarifying you’re pro-authoritarian is even necessary… Straight perfection! You embody the weak, scared, conservative simp who yearns to be ruled by a king to feel safe and secure.

              • StaySquared@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                No. I think starting with an investigation of corruption of all politicians from local to state to federal, including government agencies should be the first step, however.

          • StaySquared@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            lol… you got duped into giving away your money to a rail system that failed miserably.

            California’s HSR is perhaps the greatest infrastructure failure in the history of the country. And the reason it failed is because of a gross failure of state governance, one on such a grand scale that it is nothing short of a betrayal of Californians. The betrayal dates back to the project’s inception.

            dead.jpg

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I love “California disaster” arguments. I have some MAGA relatives that currently live in California, they decided to move and in 2022 in summer visited non-“marxist” states. And you know what? They ended up staying.

          I live in California for 25 years now and I love my state. The most opinionated about how shitty California is are people who never been here.

          • StaySquared@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Brah… I can leave my A/C on 68F all day and night and not be pressured to raise it to lol… what was it again? 78F? It’s been a couple years since I’ve left California, I believe 78F is the recommendation during the hotter months. We don’t have to worry about rolling blackouts. We don’t have to pay for grocery bags. Our gas prices currently is a dollar less than Southern California, almost two dollars cheaper than gas in the Bay Area. Beautiful state, no doubt. Chitty politicians, however.

            • takeda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              So do I. Also the only time I had an outage in 25 years was due to equipment failure and, there also was a planned maintenance. It never took longer than a couple hours.

              Grocery bags cost like what? 50 cents? It encourages having reusable bags which are more practical anyway and don’t break as often.

              As for gas, this is a problem with location. On one side we have ocean on the other we have mountains. This causes pollution to be trapped.

              This is why Los Angeles was infamous for its smog in 70s and 80s. Catalysts and specifically refined oil helped being it back to healthy levels.

              Also I don’t get the obsession with the gas. If you look at prices the gas prices were static for nearly 15 years. It is ridiculous that this is still an argument to anything.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    alarm bells?

    wait they didn’t know he was old before this debate?

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Apparently millions of people during the 2020 primaries didn’t math long enough to realize Biden would be 86 years old after two terms.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    As bad as Biden was, CNN were worse. Fuck that shitty network for allowing Trump to lie pretty much nonstop for 90 minutes unchallenged.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m more worried that he won’t win the election rather than he will win it. I don’t think the debate changes anything about that, people are likely still going to vote who they were going to vote for. He is the not Trump vote, and it’s just as important as ever if not more important to vote not Trump.

  • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Democrats knew this was going to happen. There’s no way they couldn’t. And I don’t mean Democrat supporters, many of whom were vehement that Biden was fine like so many anecdotes in this thread recount. I mean the Democrat leadership, who manage his campaign and more than likely manage his presidency. Unlike the public, they have access to him. They have his medical records, the reports of his doctors and caregivers, everything. There’s no way they didn’t know this would happen if he debated.

    They might start seeding support for a different candidate into their supporter’s discourse after this, but they will have been planning for this outcome long ago. And when a left-leaning (left from a US Overton window) news platform hosts a debate that shows him up that badly and then publishes commentary like this, you have to wonder if that caused friction with the DNC or if they assented to it.

    As the party starts singling out a replacement, the question I hope people start asking is why they didn’t replace Biden earlier? Did they need to wait until the urgency of imminent elections made their new candidate more palatable? And if they don’t replace Biden, why are they letting Trump win?

  • z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This whole thing gonna take the U outta the USA

    It was good knowing ya, murrica

  • Luna [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Please replace him with Hillary or Bernie or something it would be so funny. They could even have Hillary and Bernie debate for the candidacy 😂

  • notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The conspiracy theorists all say Joe is supposed to step down and Gavin Newsom somehow is added to the ticket which then will win. These conspiracy theorists also say that candidates are selected in advance by the powers that be and it’s all pagentry to deceive the gullible masses. If this is true, the “outcry” of concern may be a part of the plan.