
Netanyahu is clearly just being blackmailed by Putin to intentionally make Israel look bad. Anyone who disagrees with you on the internet? Russian bot. A massive wave of protests across university campuses? Believe it or not, Russian bots.
If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.
Evidence or GTFO.

Netanyahu is clearly just being blackmailed by Putin to intentionally make Israel look bad. Anyone who disagrees with you on the internet? Russian bot. A massive wave of protests across university campuses? Believe it or not, Russian bots.
Vietnam is changing on that. Hard to imagine anything that would change the minds of the other two.
2013 international Gallup poll: “Which country is the biggest threat to world peace”

The word “quarantine” originates from a Venetian policy that every single ship had to wait outside of port for 40 days to ensure nobody had the plague. I’m sure the antivax people would have no problem with such measures?
Morally neutral and innocent civilians, of course 😇

Some version of it could exist. Not with the big numbers and not with the high degree of certainty in the problem, but you could have, say, somebody who’s on average 70% accurate at reading people and the boxes are $1 and $10.
It is somewhat idealist in that it’s a contrived scenario, but it’s really just idle curiosity on my part. Maybe it could reflect something about people’s thought processes, or maybe it’s just people interpreting the question differently.
> Fires the guy whose job was assassinating heads of state
> Gets assassinated
> Guy who got fired gets on the investigative comittee which fucks up the investigation
Who could it be 🤔
So ban everyone but anarcho-pacifists from political discourse? Or does systemic violence not count?


Should we Participate in Bourgeois Parliaments? - V. I. Lenin
Even if only a fairly large minority of the industrial workers, and not “millions” and “legions”, follow the lead of the Catholic clergy—and a similar minority of rural workers follow the landowners and kulaks (Grossbauern)—it undoubtedly signifies that parliamentarianism in Germany has not yet politically outlived itself, that participation in parliamentary elections and in the struggle on the parliamentary rostrum is obligatory on the party of the revolutionary proletariat specifically for the purpose of educating the backward strata of its own class, and for the purpose of awakening and enlightening the undeveloped, downtrodden and ignorant rural masses. Whilst you lack the strength to do away with bourgeois parliaments and every other type of reactionary institution, you must work within them because it is there that you will still find workers who are duped by the priests and stultified by the conditions of rural life; otherwise you risk turning into nothing but windbags.
Lenin’s argument was that even if an electoral system is deeply flawed, participation is necessary in order to reach people who are invested in the system. In addition to spreading the message, it also provides a way to assess the strength and popularity of a platform, and it can serve as a means of testing and weeding out prospective leaders who might be opportunists.
Here, we consciously prioritize the voices of the global majority
Based. Exactly this.
Anyone who considers themself a leftist should dream of a world where one’s birthplace does not determine their political power, and should be outraged at how much global power the US wields, through force, despite comprising such a small segment of the global population. The principle of “one person, one vote” while living in an imperial hegemon means that we have a responsibility to prioritize the voices and perspectives of the global majority, and of the people affected by our countries’ aggression who have no say in our politics.
…even if that means getting called “selfish” by scratched liberals on .world who explicitly say that American lives are more valuable than those of foreigners.


Yes, as they have since the war, just as Taiwan claims China. Your point?
Peace with Taiwan has been maintained for nearly a hundred years, with a mutual understanding that nobody would try to force the issue too hard (look up “strategic ambiguity”). In recent years, the US has been recklessly deviating from that understanding and now people treat the status quo as “Chinese aggression,” because of propaganda.


B-b-b-b-b-but China might, possibly, at some point in the future, try to reclaim Taiwan! Both sides! Two things true at once! Me speculating about something possibly happening is the exact same as the thing actually happening!


Yikes guys, Operation Valkyrie seems kinda problematic, that exploding briefcase killed several Nazi officers who just happened to be in the same room as Hitler.
“This is just natural free market competition. The real problem is big government trying to impose restrictions on Hawk Inc.”

Oh shit is that this weekend? I was gonna make plans but I kept putting it off and never got around to it.
Because: