• Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Mist

    That ending was one of the most brilliant gut-punches in film history. Stephen King himself said he wished he had written it.

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Controversial, but Lord of the Rings. Tolkien wrote great stories, but his writing style always seemed kind of lackluster.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t fault him for any of his depth and character building and poetry and storytelling and descriptive environments it was all very thorough and for the right person wonderful. I think the movies did a giant justice to making his work accessible. There are a lot of people out there that can’t manage to make their way through his poetry sections. And you can’t not read the poetry sections because there’s definitely content in there you need.

    • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I encourage you not to view him as an author but as an imaginative creator confined by language.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), at the time of its release, was based on a short story called The Sentinel by Arthur C Clarke. In that story, the roots of the Tycho Monolith plot segment of 2001 of is sketched out, and then expanded as both a screenplay and a full-length novel.

    • NotNotMike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      One thing that always stuck out to me about the book is the introduction of certain editions. The author writes about himself researching the history of the country the story takes place in and describes it as real, saying he took his son to a museum with Inigo’s sword and everything.

      I was Googling furiously when I read it because I was so confused. I was astounded that the place (and people) was “real”. It took a bit of research to find that the author just does this bit and hasn’t let it go since he wrote the book

      I’m still so charmed that he tricked me. It made reading the book that much sillier, for me

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had a teacher that worked for the publisher and talked about how they’d have a series of responses for people who wrote in for the part of the book where the author says he wrote his own fanfiction scene and to write in if you wanted it.

        Like maybe the first time you write in they’d respond that they couldn’t provide it because they were fighting the Morgenstern estate over IP release to provide the material, etc.

        So people never would get the pages, but could have gotten a number of different replies furthering the illusion.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Blade runner. Much better than “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” but it is only loosely based off it.

    PS: when reading a book after watching a film, it usually feels like the book is much better, fills in details, separates scenes which a film had mixed together or altogether done away with. E.g. The Shining, LotR, Dune…but for Androids I just felt “what, that’s it?”

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Magicians: The books were good, but the TV show really was in a class all its own. And it did away with using obscure words just because, that was annoying.

    Game of Thrones: At this rate, ASOIAF is never getting done, so I’m by default giving it to the show for actually finishing the job.

    Good Omens: The first season brought the book to life, but there wasn’t source material beyond that. The second season did a great job fleshing out the characters and moving the story forward into the final season.

    • CylonBunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather the five released ASOIAF stay as they are, perpetually unfinished than anything close to the hatchet job that was the GoT show ever be released in book. For me, sometimes just finishing isn’t enough. The books > than the show 10,000 times.

        • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire.

          Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire

          • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Omg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "