• qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    19 days ago

    tl;dr False Vacuum Decay

    Maybe one day it will also tell us how worried we need to be about the Universe as we know it suddenly transforming into something else entirely.

    I mean, really? we would never see it coming and, quite honestly, it sounds like a reasonable way to go - [poof; gone]. super cool science but as far as worry goes, there are many more painful and urgent issues to attend to in the here and now.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      “In a 2005 paper published in Nature, as part of their investigation into global catastrophic risks, MIT physicist Max Tegmark and Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom calculate the natural risks of the destruction of the Earth at less than 1/109 per year from all natural (i.e. non-anthropogenic) events, including a transition to a lower vacuum state. They argue that due to observer selection effects, we might underestimate the chances of being destroyed by vacuum decay because any information about this event would reach us only at the instant when we too were destroyed.”

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    This would be the ideal end TBH. No warning, no dread, no pain, no suffering, just one instant you’re biology and the next instant you’re physics.