• Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    From a lemmygrad post on fascism


    The western left’s use of the term fascism, is borderline white-supremacist at this point. Fascism was a form of colonialism that died by the 1940s, and is only allowed to be demonized in public discourse, because it was a form of colonialism directed also against white europeans. It was defeated, and Germany / Italy / Japan reverted to the more stable form of government for colonialism (practiced by the US, UK, France, the Netherlands, Australia, etc): bourgeois parliamentarism.

    British, european, and now US colonizers were doing the exact same thing, and killing far more people for hundreds of years in the global south, yet you don’t hear ppl scared of their countries potentially "adopting parliamentary democracy”. They haven’t changed, and their wealth is still propped up by surplus value theft from the super-exploitation of hundreds of millions of low-paid global south proletarians.

    This is why you have new leftists terrified that the UK or US or europe “might turn fascist!!”, betraying that the atrocities propagated by those empires against the global south was and is completely acceptable.

    Make no mistake about it: parliamentary / bourgeois democracy is not only a more stable form of government, it’s also far more effective at carrying out colonialism, and killing millions of innocent people.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is why you have new leftists terrified that the UK or US or europe “might turn fascist!!”, betraying that the atrocities propagated by those empires against the global south was and is completely acceptable.

      While the criticism is on point, I think you’re underselling the legitimate dire fear modern leftists have when they see the brutality of the periphery returning home. We have to recognize that - individually - we’re incredibly weak in the face of a mobilized police state. And we have every reason to be horrified of The Jakarta Method being visited on LA or Atlanta or Houston, particularly if we’re members of that domestic political underclass so often targeted for abuse.

      Any opposition must be a unified and organized resistance. But we are also plagued by mass surveillance, structural alienation, and a profound sense of vulnerability cultivated over decades of “War On” maximalist state propaganda. So we’re feeling weak, we don’t know who we can trust, and we see this horrifying inevitability cresting over our heads like a tsunami.

      This isn’t a betrayal of comrades abroad but a reflection of our own dismal moral, disunity, and despair. It represents one more hurdle for a modern western left to overcome and should be received as such, rather than used as a bludgeon to degrade left-wing moral even further.

      Far better to be awake and aware and justifiably afraid of the threat of fascism than blind to it as the unaligned, compromised by it as the liberals, or enthusiastically participatory as the conservatives.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I think you’re underselling the legitimate dire fear modern leftists have when they see the brutality of the periphery returning home.

        Liberal democracies have historically been as brutal to their domestic populations as any historical fascist formulation. You can look at how the US treated (and still treats) it’s internal colonies / minorities. Nazi Germany explicitly wanted to carry out in eastern europe, what the US successfully carried out against native peoples, and failed.

        Even outside of internal colonies, if you look at how the US or Britain treated its workers or its poor of their own races(they arguably entirely defeated its domestic working class movement, rebased their countries on finance capital, and exported class struggle to the global south), it doesn’t look any different than how the historical fascist countries also defeated their working class movements.

        To me, the basis of this is western chauvinism, and belief that “liberal democracy” isn’t far worse. By pointing a finger at fascism, they get to keep their belief in the supremacy of their mode of government, that continues to wreak havoc on not just the globe, but internally also. It’s a subtle form of western-supremacist scapegoating (pointing a finger at a settler-colonialism that dared to attack western countries also)

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Never forget, the fruit of the tree of capitalism is fascism.

    Capitalism unrestrained and left to do its thing, as it has, always leads to fascism. Fascism is the takeover of the state by the capitalists.

    This is why fascism is blooming all over the western world. The global capitalist economy is simply in full bloom sitting on entirely captured nation states and fruiting.

    The fruit being concentration camps, war, poverty, and scapegoating. Anything to blame literally anyone and everything else for all the inhuman malice the capitalists are doing to attempt to satiate their unquenchable greed.

    If anyone still cares about maybe not ending the world for humanity, the capital markets must be destroyed, and speculative investment by passive robber barons not actively participating in laboring to produce products and services must be outlawed. But don’t worry, we’ll fade into the oblivion of greed made climate change out of cowardice. We’ll probably be grateful to die to that after the Fascists have had their fun.

    • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Fascism is the takeover of the state by the capitalists.

      What. Capitalism is already the takeover of the state by capitalists. The state apparatus is just the means by which the dominant class exerts its power.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        It is inevitable that capitalists will conquer their state, but with constant vigilance, for a time, capitalism can and is used as an engine to serve society, so long as it is heavily regulated and hobbled. The Nordic nations for example.

        It’s when the capitalists begin to be allowed to influence their government, and convince the people THEY can live larger than their neighbors if it weren’t for all the social equity evil government enforces, capitalism’s signature siren call.

        The Nordic countries still have free to roam policies. Capitalism here capturing their own regulators and being allowed to warp public opinion with blatant self serving lies through for profit media pulpits make some Americans eager to shoot other Americans.

        I’m not for capitalism at all because it eventually leads here, to fascism, and eventually someone in power will be dumb or corrupt enough to let their guard down. But we let our capitalists conquer our government, as have several western nations. And here we are.

        • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nope. The Nordic countries are still controlled by capitalists, they (akd most of western Europe as well) just have given the workers some welfare policies in order to appease them and stop any revolutionary ideas. It’s no coincidence that these policies were in place while the Eastern bloc was around and they began to dismantle the welfare state as soon as the USSR fell and they felt they could get away with it.

          (Disclaimer: I’m not saying that the welfare state is evil, and that we’d be better with the shitty US way of doing things)

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    So the thing is classical liberals were (and are) capable of a lot of damage without Fascism. Fascism is a specific ideology. Not the suffering people are capable of creating. It’s important to understand that your normal democracy is perfectly capable of creating mass suffering.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, perfectly modeling fascism is a failure. I didn’t want to suggest that we hit bottom just because we checked some boxes. There’s still plenty of room for things to get worse if we don’t do anything to stop it.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Anyone downvoting this, should be able to explain why what the the US and European powers did to Africa, Asia, and the americas during the 1700-1900s, was any better or fundamentally different than what fascist formulations from 1920-1945 did. And those atrocities were all done using a far more stable form of government: bourgeois parliamentarism / liberal democracy.

      People really need to read Losurdo’s - Liberalism, a counter-history. Liberals invented the slave trade, and the victorian holocausts. The only difference between them and the fascists, are that they’re far better at colonialism and genocide than the fascists were.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I keep trying to tell people classical liberals were bastards. There’s this perception that just because we can vote that means we can’t be the bad guys. It’s an ideological catechism that actually fits with the above picture. If Fascism is just whenever mass suffering and death is perpetrated but also World War 2 non voting systems run by strong men then it gives the modern person living in a democracy permission to stop paying attention. After all they can vote and their guy would never.

        We need to get this through people’s heads, stop putting flashy words on human rights violations and start holding leaders accountable. Because a culture of not being accountable is how you get actual Fascism.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel like it’s unamerican in regards to the values our country espouses, even though it completely and utterly fails to uphold them.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      “American values” are just a smokescreen, they aren’t failed, more they serve their purpose of obfuscation well.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Nah man, Americans have values. Freedom, perseverance, independence, self expression. It’s just that we have utterly failed to uphold those values in our actions. Even in the beginning, talking about slavery being terrible but still allowing it for political reasons right at the founding.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Those values only really served as a way for the ruling class that founded America to justify itself. They weren’t genuine.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m talking about the shared cultural values of the society we have today, views shared by most Americans. Most Americans like free speech. Most Americans like liberty. Et cetera and so on. These are things that are part of our culture. You aren’t any less of a person for recognizing that these are values that are held by this culture.

            I am also saying that despite culturally sharing in these values, our society also fails to actually support them in very big ways.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 days ago

              And I am telling you that the cultural aspects came from a desire from the ruling class to support freedom for Capitalists to do what they want, and morally justify it. That’s why these values never seem to actually be supported, just gestured towards.

              • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                So you admit that those cultural aspects are actually there. Which are failed when they are used to support the ruling class.

                Which was my point.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  They succeed in their purpose, to obscure the systems that uphold the ruling class. These cultural values didn’t appear out of thin air, but deliberately to preserve the wealthy Capitalists that founded the country.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah dawg that’s my point. We have the ideal of equality but also failed to actually follow through with it.

  • taanegl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Woa, hey now. Too close. I think I’m going to have to back up a truckload of apologia. BEEP-BEEP-BEEP-BEEP - is it there? Is it up to the line? Good.

    Unloads why republics should be ethnically pure, but spun in a way that vaguely unsharps the truths jagged edge, while pining for a time gone by and fear mongering to whatever would be mob that could dawn balaclavas and facemasks to terrorize local neighborhoods with bigoted chants and flags in hand.

    I say no, fascist, back to hell with you - and stay there. That is your home, that is where you should stay, forever and ever and ever - and if for some reason they should be let back out, it’s up to the entirety of the human species to slap them straight back down to the depths that they came from.

    Give me liberty, or give me dead fascists - because the latter has a tendency to produce the former.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      “You say we live indoors yet you pointed to four walls, a door, and a roof. None of these is specific to a building.”

      Fucking hell

      • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        He’s right tho. The stuff in the meme are just things that happened under capitalism.

        Let’s not whitewash capitalism by blaming its atrocities on fascism.

          • Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s whitewashing because it’s implying that genocide, leftist suppression, etc are the exclusive characteristics of a fascistic system instead of business as usual under capitalism. This removes the bad aspects of capitalism (“if this is happening it’s because the US has turned fash, it’s not capitalism’s fault”).

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        This doesnt even mention nationalism or belief in a natural social hierarchy

        It would be closer to saying that pointing to four walls, a door and a roof disprove the statement “this is not a building”