• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Huh, I don’t quite remember this guy from Toy Story, but if you say he was there I believe you

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can we just drop the codenames and simply use the numbers? What’s the point? Those names are a fucking mess, create more confusion than help new people and add no benefit to anything.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can just use “stable”, “testing”, and “unstable” if you prefer. And I don’t just mean in conversation I mean update /etc/apt and be done.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The point is that if you say “Debian 9” it is immediately clear what version it is and what’s the context today as long as the person knows the stable is 12. If you say “Debian Stretch” it’s just noise, random words that mean nothing if the other person knows that stable is Bookworm.

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I run Debian and I don’t know what number or Toy Story character I use. I know I’m on testing, so I say that.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Hm… Has anyone ever suggested they just do both? Wouldn’t that be amazing.

          Though I would prefer a naming scheme like Ubuntu, with the first letter incrementing. That would be more useful than the current names.