From https://reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1hokr0c/mozilla_chair_pay_vs_firefox_market_share_2023/m4aca4j/:

Total 2022 pay: $6,903,089
Total 2023 pay: $6,260,072 - a $643,017 decrease
Base chair pay: $600,000
2023 chair bonuses and other incentives: $5,622,600

Sources:

For comparison, here are other executive salaries ($0 bonuses for each)

Executive name Title Total Pay (2023)
MARK SURMAN PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 715,143
J. BOB ALOTTA SVP, GLOBAL PROGRAMS 508,138
ANGELA PLOHMAN COO, SECRETARY & TREASURER 452,234
ASHLEY BOYD SVP, GLOBAL ADVOCACY 427,701
ZHILUN PANG DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 273,069
DAVID WALKER SENIOR COUNSEL 268,565
LAINIE DECOURSY DIRECTOR, ORG EFFECTIVENESS 267,028
JUAN BARANI SENIOR DIRECTOR, GIFT PLANNING 262,879
STEPHANIE WRIGHT SR PROGRAM MANAGER, MOZFEST 236,785
  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    He is obviously way too highly paid by an insane amount, but where are these people going? There’s no way they’re all going to Chrome, right?

    • unfinished | 🇵🇸@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not a browser I would recommend to most people as it’s still in early development and breaks websites all the time. Librewolf/Firefox are better.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The argument is if you don’t pay a CEO enough, they will go elsewhere where they are paid more. I don’t know whether that is a good argument or not, but (at least some) CEOs have a skill set critical to the success of an organization. It would be interesting to know how the pay of CEOs in general has changed over time. That would tell you if this is shitty or not. My expectation is that it is somewhere in the middle leaning toward acceptable

  • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this inclusive to all the forks? Alot of folks run forks cus they don’t like both ff and chrome. Just sayin.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t matter, all the forks combined make up a fraction of FF.

      Plus people moving to forks still hurts Mozilla

      • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well they can suck the doodoo out my butthole cus that’s what they get if they keep going the wannabe big tech company route.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s sad to see Firefox continue to lose popularity I thought there might be some kind of comeback but no.

    • tbird83ii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Part of the problem is both Chrome and Edge come installed by default on the company’s own products, and they have massive campaigns to keep you from switching, since user data is so profitable for them to sell.

      It is up to us, the “person who does IT for the whole family” to beat back the other browsers.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ugh I use Firefox because fuck chrome, but they do have some really annoying ass bugs that should have been dealt with long ago before they kept adding features.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    til my favorite browser has been losing a lot of ground over the years, i guess i’ve been living in my foxy bubble

  • madthumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Graphs like these have been going on for years.

    It is possible that the CEO came in and cleaned out the bloat of workers that just come in and hang out basically (common in the tech field and has been done to Twitter (X)). -That would make the salary increase correlate to savings. Showing a correlation between development and available funds would be pertinent. Just off the top of my head, I remember significant improvements since first seeing graphs like this.

    Also take into account the competition was dismal until Chrome came along. Much like the game console market when Sony entered it, the browser market was hurting with a hole to fill for a strong leader.

    Mozillas politics don’t help. Choosing a side can alienate about half your user base. Flip-flopping sides and you’re killing off your whole user base. Declaring dishonestly that ‘we can’t do this without your donations’ while making bank from Google (long time ago) doesn’t help either. Politics would need to come into play here and how much those are on the CEO.

    They mostly appeal to Linux users (people more likely to switch out things), and almost every Linux YouTuber promotes Brave (which is shady af). Brave also has or had an undeniable corporate presence in the browsers sub on Reddit with weekly Brave vs *** for a particular category Brave would win at by low karma accounts. Firefox lacked that marketing, not for being a bad browser. Prior to, they had the FOSS fanbase influencing for them.

    Statistics and graphs are tools of propagandists. There might be something there, but there’s often a bigger picture to be seen. Firefox isn’t a bad browser, and I’m hoping they can turn it around to gain marketshare again. (and drop all politics).