• InputZero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Foundations by Isaac Asimov. It’s a great story but it’s a tough read. Way better as an audiobook.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I like it but i noticed while reading it that Isaac Asimov has such an optimistic 1950s view, it can be challenging to keep reading with such limited conflict.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    the scarlet letter. I found it extremely unrelatable, and generally boring. I think The Crucible play by the same author arthur miller* conveys the same overarching principles about religious hypocrisy and herd mentality in a much more interesting way.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Possibly showing my ignorance here, but The Crucible is by Arthur Miller, and The Scarlet Letter is by Nathaniel Hawthorne - did either of them write a work with the other title as well? I can’t find anything to suggest they did, but I might be missing something.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Of books I’ve completed, Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge. Read it at school, hated it (as well as Far from the Madding Crowd and Tess of the D’Urbervilles) - full of ridiculous coincidences. And also utterly miserable to boot.

    I started reading The Da Vinci Code, but gave up after the very first page.

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. And I’m not being a book snob here, I’ve read plenty of books that weren’t the height of intellectualism. But it’s so BAD… 😁

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Harry Potter. I tried to read first book but couldn’t, the cringyness was high and the naming convention was straight up from 90’s bad fantasy book parody. It’s like one of the few books i not finished after i started, and i read a lot. And while the others are just forgettable experiences, HP is constantly in my face in media, reminding me of it.

    • Farvana@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The first book was a Roald Dahl ripoff, and I enjoyed it for that. Everything was downhill from there.

  • atan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    A tossup between books 7-10 of the Wheel of Time series. I gave up half way through book 10 and resent the time that I wasted on the series. 20 years later I still recall the desperate hope that the next chapter/book would advance the storyline, only to be greeted with more subplots, stupid things happening because of characters inability/unwillingness to communicate, and overly verbose descriptions of every little thing.

    I hear the final books, written by a different author, were much better.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    For me personally: Triton. I remember reading it 25+ years ago. I really had to fight through it, after circa half of it I put it away and never touched it again.

    So remarkably not my favorite book that I still feel the exhaustion when thinking about it.

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can’t remember the name but there’s a novel set in Ireland in the not-too-distant future

    Synopsis implied it had become a surveillance state but didn’t gave up before confirming due to the literal writing style

    I swear every sentence was written in the passive voice (poorly remembered examples):

    “It was made known through the clothes he wore they were sent from the department of security”

    “As she walked outside the smell made Spring’s arrival clear”

    Totally fine normally but do it every single sentence and it becomes a mystery novel where the mystery is what the hell you just read!

    … Or idk, Harry Potter 5 is pretty meandering

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you sure it wasn’t set in Scotland? Charlie Stross wrote a novel a bit like you describe, its in the second person, which is very unusual and definitely rubs some people the wrong way. I think it was Halting State.

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Court of Thorns and Roses. It came highly recommended by my sister and many others.

    I get the appeal, an adult retelling of classic fantasy. But it felt like it was written just to be edgey, sexy and proactive. Which is fine if that’s what you are wanting, lots of media does this. I was just hoping for a new angle or dimension on Beauty and the Beast, not just a sexy B&B. I guess that does count as a new angle, but not one for me.

  • faultypidgeon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fourth Wing by Rebecca Yaos. I was expecting a nice fantasy story with dragons and shit. But the romance part of it was just so annoying. “Oh look that dude is so hot…” at every. single. occasion. I could’ve known beforehand that this book is more targeted towards female readers, but sometimes I just like to go to the book store and buy a book based on the blurb. Since then I made the new rule to keep my distance to books that mention TikTok or #BookTok on the cover.

  • Bob@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve read some utter wank in my day, but the one that first springs to mind is Fault in their Stars by John Green.