deleted by creator
programmer: “11”
deleted by creator
concat: “11”
cat: ignores your inquiry
Onety one
No that’s “1” + “1”
Looks Good To Me!
Engineer: 2, but 3 to be safe.
1+1=3 in cases of large 1’s
I’m surprised the 6 year old knows factorials.
Not only that, it is mathematically correct, at least given the usual definitions of 1, 2, +, and !
You can’t put an expression on the left-hand-side of the assignment operator.
You need more expressive languages.
You forgot accountant
“What do you need it to be?”
We need to report negative earnings so we don’t have to pay taxes obviously
Computer Scientist: 10
O(1)
Terrence Howard : 2 !! Also 1x1=2 !!
Quantum physicist: Whats the uncertainty?!
Computer Scientist: 0 and a carry bit
Mathematician: S(1)
How would a two year old know factorials?
Appliance salesperson: oven + pan = hamburger
Math isn’t induction. Its deductive logic.
How old this be inductive reasoning?
Surely the philosopher is the one looking for definitions…
