NoLifeGaming

They wanna do the same in iran, have a puppet regime that follows their commands instead of doing the best for the populace

Fantastic title

Why subject your self and enslave yourself to the IMF?

Everyone they dont like is hamas obviously

Math isn’t induction. Its deductive logic.

All this talk about iran sounds like another beating the drums for an iraq war.

Fair enough

As if the american based companies don’t do the same lol

Ah yes the good old “rules for thee but not for me”

Just in case anyone thought anything other than its just political posturing, here you go.

Finally the turkish gov does more than just talking

The highest order of interference in the US comes from AIPAC, it must go

Ah yes, nothing like being Israel’s lapdog

Removed by mod

Ukraine is already losing and unless something crazy happens they will lose.

Keep digging yourself deeper and just citing some other philosopher as if they’re infallible instead of engaging with my arguments. If you have nothing to say of substance then stop wasting my time

Never said I was smarter than them. You must enjoy putting words in people’s mouths.

And you bud seem to like to run with the authority fallacy instead of deconstructing my argument and showing it as false. A beacon of intelligence.

I understand it very well but you seem to not understand that there is such a thing as syntactical garbage that means nothing. What you’ve done is gone and applied “all powerful” to mean the realization of possibilities which cannot exist. It seems like you really wanna push that definition upon people so you can claim God is paradoxical and thus ridiculous. But your position is just as ridiculous as someone saying that an apple can both exist and not exist at the same time.

saying “all powerful” is to say that a being can realize any possibility which can exist. A possibility which cannot exist is like a squared circle. The strawman is that all powerful means to realize even things which cannot exist. In this world there are things which are necessary existence. Meaning they cannot not exist. An example would be the statement “1+1=2” that statement cannot not exist and it is true in all possible worlds. Then you have possible existence such as someone eating an apple. There isn’t anything necessary about it and the person could have very well not eaten it or eaten something else. The apple itself isn’t a necessary existence. Finally, there is an impossible existence. Which would be something that cannot exist like a squared circle. A God which deletes himself or that can create a rock heavier than himself is an impossible existence as it would contradict the very definition we’ve given God. Which is the same as saying A and not A. Or that he can both be God and not God. Thus it is syntactical jargon like a squared circle.