• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This must be the famous Linux-to-queer pipeline I’ve heard so much about.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just a couple of bros snuggling while rasing a family together.

    No homo tho

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Giraffe, why are you gay?

      Disclaimer: Pepe Julian Onziema is an absolute legend and hero and is based in Kenya’s neighbor Uganda, not actually Kenya, but THAT interview is a source of joy for me and jumped to my head.

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m not saying this fact about penguins isn’t true, I don’t know, but this isn’t a real wikipedia screenshot like it acts like it is. In fact, searching for “homosexuality is common in penguins” only returns results for transcriptions of this meme.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Haha I’m committed to the truth but not that committed. Anyone can edit an article to put in whatever blurb they want, but it won’t stick for long if most of the community agrees with it and it has decent citations (none of which are in the screenshot). Also the text isn’t written professionally, “love to cuddle” is not language that would normally appear in a scientific wiki article.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Love that you saw this and was like “this can’t be true. Gotta fact check bullshit”. Like why do you need to go out of your way for that?

  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    From the penguin documentaries I watched as a kid, I feel like the “leaving eggs behind” might involve relentless bullying.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It takes two penguins working together to care for an egg, if one penguin dies the remaining penguin can’t hold the egg and feed itself, so either a couple steps up or a lone penguin joins the remaining penguin, having several homosexual couples who are on standby to take care of orphan eggs is a clear evolutionary advantage.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d be cautious with saying evolutionary advantage here.

        I don’t believe the “Gay Uncle hypothesis” any more than the somewhat debunked “Grandmother Hypothesis”, which aimed to explain menopause with biological altruism. Just because we could think of a way in that it might be advantageous for a species doesn’t mean it’s advantageous for an individuals fitness.

        Of course, it can be still an advantage, but we’d only know with more free, uncensored research.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Does evolutionary pressure only exist on individuals? I’ve never heard that. There’s a wide variety of species that are highly socially organized, do you not accept that that’s through evolutionarily pressure?

          • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I never said that. What I meant is that a behaviour, which benefits a species as a whole but reduces one individual’s fitness, is not evolutionary competitive. It’s evolutionary game theory, like the prisoners dilemma from normal game theory.

            And to determine if some behaviour is such a dilemma, you have to consider costs and benefits of it, which is not at all clear in natural situations. That’s why I said it needs to be studied.

            But I must concede, I sort of assumed what exactly you called an evolutionary advantage. Common homosexuality in penguins or not discriminating against homosexual individuals in penguins have very different analysis here.

  • mihor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Akshualy those are lesbians, because birds have XX for male and XY for female. 😅

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are we pretending that humans and animals do the same things? You can be fine with homosexuality, but what animals do have nothing to do with what humans do.