• PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I actually think universal basic income is a very flawed idea from a leftist perspective.

    It is effectively a capitalist compromise that still puts all of the asset holders in immense positions of power. The only difference now is they effectively are governmentally enforced as those positions of power. It will make the wealth disparity exponentially worse.

    The answer to our wealth disparity is to put power in the hands of the average person.

    • running_ragged@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Having the mass majority of the population trapped in jobs that pay just enough that they put up with it, while giving away all their time and energy to a corporation is exactly why the average person has no power. They’ve had the will drive to force real change sucked out of them.

      UBI is a mechanism that can help them take back their time and energy to affect real change.

      • fishpen0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Given the issues with minimum wage, what makes you think UBI won’t have the same issues regarding inflation and governments not raising the minimums? UBI experiments have always been in small communities and never large enough to show if inflation would simply catch up with it. What stops landlords from just unilaterally raising rents to suck up the UBI payments for example?

        Real reform would be housing credits, expansion of food aid and centralization of medical care

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Take a look at Japan. They aren’t exactly doing UBI, but they are printing boatloads of cash, handing it to their citizens and corporations, and are just barely staving off deflation.

          Shit gets weird when your population is well educated enough, and rich enough that they stop having multiple kids.

        • running_ragged@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What issues with minimum wage, other than the capitalists who are desperate to keep their costs down from crying wolf about inflation?

          I’m still waiting for anyone to show data that raising the minimum wages leads to higher inflation. Should be pretty easy to show looking at the minimum wages across countries over the last 25-50 years, while also looking at the inflation rates over that same period.

          As far as governments not raising the minimums, that is the result of poor policy when they were implemented, to not tie the minimum wage to inflation in the first place. People are more aware of that issue now, so hopefully that mistake wouldn’t be implemented.

          I don’t really expect UBI to be implemented on a larger scale because the people who buy the laws won’t allow it.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they worked for democratic cooperatives and not dictatorial corporations they would have power to raise their pay and work less.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      If the labor force could opt out of the rat race because they didn’t have to work, then they gives them immense power especially considering what they have now. Of course the necessities would have to be controlled in a not-for-profit manner so that you can’t just have some land baron that adjusts the cost of rent and food upward to ensure it eats up all the UBI, same with utilities/internet/etc.

      But for consumerist goods that people want because they enhance life, if people could realistically withhold their labor unless the capitalist offered equity etc in industries that produced those things, you would quickly see the power of the leaders of those industries wane significantly.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes. All the free market economy guys are making assumptions about efficient markets and infinite choices, but none of that is true. But the reality is laborers don’t even have the ability to leave a shitty job even with alternatives available, like just interviewing would use up a precious sick day or cost them hours of wage.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          For most jobs in the US you’d be burning a sick day and losing hours of wages. Most jobs in the US do not pay you for sick days, they just don’t use that as an excuse to fire you.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The answer to our wealth disparity is to put power in the hands of the average person.

      Average voter: “Ugh, all the power and responsibility is too much work. Can’t we just elect someone that takes care of all of this for us?” Congress/parliaments are born. “Ugh, keeping track of all these politicians and their policies and waiting for them to enact laws is too slow and tedious. Can’t we just elect some sort of super politician that promises to take care of all our problems quickly?”

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. My fundamental problem with things like UBI, reform/regulation, etc is that it leaves power in the hands of capitalists. Maybe in the short term you get some gains for a broader segment of society like during the height of union power in the US, (recognizing that even that was imperfect because of segregation) but in the long term capitalists can keep using their wealth and power to chip away at those societal gains. The only way to counter this while maintaining capitalism would be perpetual political activism, but that’s simply not feasible. People need to sleep, eat, work, and live their lives. Corporations don’t. They can hire lobbyists and lawyers to keep chipping away long after everyone else goes home.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is one reason I’m especially interested in worker cooperatives.

        You’re right, people spend 8+ hours a day at work, strengthening business owners, who are essentially working against them. Then some small fraction of people have/take the time to learn about issues affecting them and volunteer a couple hours a week for their chosen cause.

        Even those in a union are negotiating from the standpoint of “the company owns the equipment/processes/customers and we own our labor”.

        What if instead the workers also own the business? Now you’re spending eight hours (or less) a day working on something that directly benefits you, and with which you’re intimately familiar. It’s possible to make democratic decisions because it’s not some abstract issue or far away politician. And every successful worker cooperative reduces the money going to some micro-king, and in turn reduces the distorting effect of corporate money on our electoral system.

    • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The answer (I think) it’s not UBI, cooperatives OR more democracy. It’s all this at once and even more.

      UBI would mean everyone has a meal under a roof and has no fear of starting a business. Cooperatives put the value of the work in the hands of the worker. Free public universal healthcare and education systems with public affordable/free housing and public supermarkets makes everyone safer.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The problem with UBI is it won’t come without the power of the people forcing it. And then when that dies down it can just as easily be taken away. If you’ve got a mass movement with that power, why would stop at a bandaid?

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Post economic system. You don’t need one the only excuse is to control society under a monetary policy and scheme.

  • nephs@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    From each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs.

    • Karl Marx, 1875, Critique of the Gotha Programme.
  • Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    The problem I have with UBI is say I get a hundred bucks a week from it, there’s not a single thing stopping my landlord, or my utility companies, or local supermarkets, or anyone in this godforsaken system from just raising their prices to siphon it all away.

    We don’t need universal income, we need universal services. Garaunteed housing, food, public transport, healthcare, everything needed to sustain atleast a basic standard of living so we’re not constantly in fear of whether the last month of 70 hour work weeks is going to be enough to keep of the streets and keep food on the table.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      In theory, we live in a competitive market where entities can’t arbitrarily raise prices

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t post screenshots of commentary of screenshots of articles

    This is bullshit unworthy content all the way down