I personally don’t see a value until we can get rid of the title bar and gain some vertical space.

I say this as a sane person who maintains under 10 tabs at all times but I do acknowledge that most of you are lunatics when it comes to browser tabs.

We already have an implementation. You me and OP are all on Lemmy. So can you answer these in the context of Lemmy again?

Haha nice try. If everyone starts liking it then it won’t be niche anymore. So I won’t share it! /s

Yes I understood that in the second reading. I deleted the comment but I guess it was not propagated in time everywhere. Also you can’t add up the men’s and women’s percentages because the number of participates could vary between the two groups.

deleted by creator

Nah I am just asking you to show that you have substance behind your words. Without proof that you’ve done your homework, your words are surface level and aren’t worth anything.

And you have a new claim that the system got looted. When did that happen? Do you know the difference between then and now or is this again a surface level claim?

You gave me non answers.

1. Yes we need smart people everywhere not just in politics. Be it doctors, accountants, engineers, clerks, elctricians and everywhere else. So when it comes writing the constitution, how do you select these smart people?
2. So your answer is you don’t know you’d just accept and believe what the “smart people” tell you?
3. So who changes the constitution? Same smart people who wrote the bad constitution? Do you need a new set of smart people? If so how do you select these new people?

Have you given any serious thought to what you’re advocatong for?

I didn’t ask a hypothetical question. Do you have the answer for those 3 questions?

1. Who writes the constitution?
2. How do we know the constitution is good?
3. What do we do if the constitution is bad?

This would be a sick white ink tattoo.

Time to elect better politicians.

Yes, the breed should be distroyed. But not the poor living animals. We should simply stop breeding more of them. Pitbulls are a freak of nature created for the amusement of humans.

Anyone whos been around a lot of dogs will tell you that small dogs are more bitey.

There you go, thats exactly the point. But they aren’t killing any babies. Pitbulls were bred for fighting. People have Tigers and Lions as pets too. Is that also justified?

The fact that a pit bull is stronger and can do more damage is also not the dogs fault.

Of course it’s not the dog’s fault. It is just an animal. It’s the breeders’ and the owners’ fault. Nobody is advocating for euthanasing Pitbulls. Maybe just get a Golden Retriever if you’re just looking for a pet next time.

Hey did you get that idea from the coffee shop thread? Someone was asking about weird outlets shown in a picture.

My answer for the question is obviously the UK standard.

Hahah. If the commentor just went “you’re right, I just changed my mind”. That itself would make the OP some pause 😂

What you refer to here is known as “security through obscurity”. Which is arguably worse than “security through design”.

Your car.

https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo

I am not a fan of other workouts but I LOVE cycling. Wind in my face, sightseeing, ability to push harder or just cruise to catch my breath makes it really enjoyable IMO.