My head tells me Linux Mint, but my heart says listen to your head. Why is this hard? 😂

    • bleustenns@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Respectfully huge disagree. Standard Fedora would be better (and is my personal recommendation) since a bunch of administrative command syntax would be different with Atomic. The internet’s going to show troubleshooting advice for the former 9 times out of 10.

      • Clocks [She/They]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You just described exactly why I would install an Atomic distribution.

        So they can’t run something they don’t understand, and end up nuking their install.

        The biggest differences in usage (dnf vs rpm-ostree) essentially function as a knowledge/intelligence filter to prevent fuckups.

        Everything I value is against “how long it will work without issue”, “how quick is an update”, and finally “how much effort do I need to help maintain it”.

        Atomic systems have netted me positives on all my values. The people I know who used atomic, have only approached me due to edge cases such as specific laptop fan issues, which weren’t hindered by the atomic system.

      • ggiesen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They’re both terrible choices for a beginner - constant version churn every six months confuses newcomers, some initial brokenness after every new release - Fedora would be the last distro I’d install.