Hey guys! I’m getting into the open source world and for years, i am finally hoing to try Linux! However, i see a lot of complains about Ubuntu and i just dont know why. What are you guys complains about Ubuntu? My next PC will come with Ubuntu. Do you guys think i should use Mint instead? Need help.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Use whatever feels comfortable. Both are fine. People are complaining about micro annoyances that should not really affect you at first.

    When you get comfortable with Linux, you’ll also get to pick sides in micro battles like KDE vs Gnome, vi vs emacs, systemd vs sysv, flatpak vs snap and all the other wonderful my-side-is-better-than-yours fights.

      • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        This is an objectively false statement. There are at least one scenario I can think of where Snap is better than flatpak.

        Edit: You guys really don’t know what objectively better means huh.

    • provectus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      systemd vs sysv

      There is no systemd vs sysv war. It is systemd suck or systemd fine.

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Indeed. It seems that everyone dislikes sysv, but a small group can’t decide on what the better option is.

    • Jack@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      micro battles like KDE vs Gnome

      I don’t think that’s a small thing for someone new to Linux.

      I prefer Xfce over MATE, KDE, and Cinnamon because I use old computers. I wouldn’t recommend modern GNOME.

  • MonaySimpson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Ubuntu has ads in the OS, mint dosnt.

    Installed mint on my parents laptops so they didn’t become e-waste when Win11 came out. They have no issues.

    Being new(ish) to Linux since that time and I found that the main distortion are better than their sub “flavours”. For me anyway. I didn’t like Mint LMDE or Kubuntu etc.

  • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 days ago

    Between those two, I would go with regular Debian, or Mint LMDE if it has to be one of the two.

    Debian is much better about providing a reasonably updated desktop experience these days.

    As for Ubuntu… Their engineering is bad, and they’re shady. They push their solutions over standard stuff, and their solutions are conveniently setup to allow them to close source the code if anything ever reaches wide adoption or are proprietary from the beginning.

  • dragospirvu75@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    I prefer Mint over Ubuntu because of the default desktop environment. Also, in Mint you can unintall apps directly from menu with right-click-uninstall.

  • Mint is based on Ubuntu LTS (long-term support) releases, unless you go with LMDE which is based on Debian. There is not a major technical difference but there are political differences between the projects.

    The main reason to go with Mint instead of Ubuntu is if you prefer Cinnamon over GNOME as I do, and want a distribution built around the Cinnamon desktop environment.

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    My only issue with Ubuntu is that snap feels fairly clunky. That’s why I moved to fedora. Also, definitely worth looking at pop os. But, all of them come down to personal preference

    I think these days, Linus Torvalds moved to fedora

    • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Second the rec for Pop OS. It’s basically Ubuntu without Snap (with some other differences as well, of course). Cosmic is pretty nice though I encountered a few show-stopping issues on my office PC that pushed me off it. They may have been fixed by now, though.

      Debian+KDE for me, though. Using it in the office, at home, and on my portable mini-ITX streaming box, and it does everything I ask of it without getting in my way.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    ubuntu makes controversial choices. Mint is explicitly user friendly, and its debian edition is like a bike with training wheels, getting you debian with extra “niceties”.

    LMDE (Linux mint debian edition) is, from my POV, the gold standard for noob distros. Ubuntu is explicitly like a tricycle but LMDE is like a bike with training wheels. You can eventually take them off for debian next time you change OS with less problems, if you want. I going from LMDE + Cinnamon to Debian + KDE shouldn’t be an issue.

  • read_desert@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    Ubuntu is fine, though with the recent rewrite of coreutils I’d be concerned about stability and bugs. That said switching distros is pretty easy, trying other distros in a VM is easy too. I always keep my data on another disk so it’s never affected if I break something. I recommend Mint (LMDE version) and Fedora Desktop with whatever desktop environment suits you.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    i am finally hoing to try Linux!

    me too! i love linux and would absolutely hoe for it if i could! lol

    i’ll recompile your kernel for a handjob… lmao

  • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Ubuntu is fine, people’s objection to it is largely ideological. For a band new user you probably wouldn’t notice. Ubuntu also has a more modern desktop than Mint, and a much larger user-base and therefore much more guides and support, though Mint is based on Ubuntu so it’s probably not that different.

    The big thing with Ubuntu is that you are sort of at the behest of whatever Canonical want. They have a track record of pushing their own way of doing things and not really giving a damn whether or not users like it. The big one is Snap, their attempt at a universal app packaging pipeline which uses a proprietary backend. Snap does have some benefits over flatpak from an engineering standpoint, but many dislike them. If you feel ideologically opposed to Snap, just use Debian, it’s easy enough to install these days. It is also worth noting that Snap can be removed from a fresh install pretty easily.

  • provectus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Ubuntu is fine. When you get your PC, you can see for yourself and decide. If Ubuntu just works for you, stick with it, if it is a bad experience, try another GNU/Linux distro. Be aware though that the back end of the appstore in Ubuntu is proprietary/closed-source/nonfree/bad.

  • Libre Extremist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    My problem with Ubuntu is the way snaps are so closely tied to the distro. If they were optional, I would have just stuck with it. But I also like Mint anyway. It’s just good.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    If it comes with Ubuntu and you like it, stick with it. At least give it a try. Everyone can tell you why they dislike it, but most distro hate/discussion is pretty minor compared to like Windows versus Linux discussion lol.