• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/513049/alphabet-annual-global-income/

    Let’s pause a moment and just appreciate how much money Alphabet actually make net (after expenses). $73,795,000,000 last year - higher than the GDP of entire nations, in profit.

    The “bad” year, 2022 that drove all this change, they only made $59,972,000,000 net. Oh how terrible (!)

    5 years ago, they made $34,343,000,000 net, so they’ve more than doubled profits.

    Take a moment to appreciate that, and really consider if they “need” the money.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 months ago

    Please download and archive your favorite channels and videos!

    Host them yourself to watch them locally.

    Especially do this for educational material, share it wide and far!

    We are entering a very dark age of techno-dystopia, we need to fight it with everything we have. Pirate, seed, screen-record, download, archive, share, never give up.

      • mortrek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Made a script/cron job to auto dl new videos from my favorite channels with ytdlp and then they are hosted through jellyfin. Archived forever, ad free, accessible to me from anywhere.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I also recommend NewPipe for Android. It lets you download in multiple formats and shows comments in a mobile format (you can get it through the F-Droid store or from github.)

        • raker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          NewPipe

          FreeTube for Windows. Finally stable, download options, subs, history, ex-/importable data, locally, no ads of course. It’s awesome!

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’ve been trying for a minute. Must be different now that they’re saying it!

    Checks notes

    Nope, revanced still works.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Depends on where you get it. Recently had to go through and find another version, as mine was detected by YouTube and just said to download the official version of YouTube to play videos.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I simply cannot get revanced to even download to my phone, and I’m not smart enough to troubleshoot it.

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Gotta love this shit. Conservatives/companies: “Let the market decide!” The market: “We are tired of you cramming ads down our throats and fundamentally do not want it and will actively fight you on it.” Companies: “Waaaaaa, they are fighting us.”

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        “A company should be able to decide not to do business with individuals for ideological reasons.”

        Twitter, Facebook, etc. start filtering misinformation and banning offenders.

        “Mah freedoms are being infringed!”

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fuck them. I’d rather donate quadruple the money for premium to my favourite creators directly than give a single penny to this parasitic mega corporation.

    The issue is not only the ads, it’s the stupid shit it throws you to keep you hooked, it’s the stupid shorts that literally no one asked for, it’s every stupid little thing that fights for your attention. Basically the app doesn’t work for you, it works against you. That’s not the case with third party apps, they have you, the user, in mind, not their profits.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Youtube isn’t some one of a kind miracle. There’s at least a dozen already-established streaming platforms that would take its place. There are thousands of websites that have no problems hosting gigs and gigs of porn, so it’s not as difficult as people think.

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It kind of is. YouTube has decades of history. Unfathomable amounts of video. No indie platform will ever come close to hosting more than a fraction of a percent of YouTube’s library and be as accessible and as fast. It would cost an unbelievable amount of money in servers and maintenance let alone moderation. The problem is this is a service, like many others that exist today, that does not bring in more money than it costs. YouTube exists because it’s a branch on a megacorporation tree, but even Google will eventually need to find a way to make it profitable. It is impossible to fund this for free or anywhere close to free.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        If the modern internet teaches us anything, its that everything is ephemeral even when you stringently catalogue every last byte of data. People just dont need access to 90% of YouTube’s library, yet Youtube has to pay big money to make 100% of that library available 24/7 365.

        There’s already rips at the seams of these systems. Time is not on the side of YouTube.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        No indie platform will ever come close to hosting more than a fraction of a percent of YouTube’s library and be as accessible and as fast.

        The number of times I’ve heard “XYZ will never happen” in the area of tech from one person or another over the decades (or made the mistake of thinking so myself) is high.

        Youtube will either become reasonable in their practices again (which could include a pricing adjustment for ad-free access), or will be replaced as the de facto video service. It may not happen in the short timespan we’d all like to see, but it will happen.

        • graymess@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          History would suggest that, but I’m starting to believe we’re in a tech service bubble that’s ready to pop. I touched on this in my comment, but it’s becoming clearer than ever that the vast majority of the services we use today are not sustainable on a number of levels. Economically, they’re all a mess.

          Food delivery services are bleeding money constantly in the hopes that one day they’ll find a way to profit. They won’t. It’s an insane business model. The actual cost of the service is many times the price of the food you’re buying. Uber/Lyft already isn’t keeping prices low enough to be a cheap option anymore because they’ve coasted too long on VC funding and it’s time for them to start making money. But they still aren’t and if they charged what it actually costs to operate, no one would use it. Many online platforms can’t sustain themselves despite being major social media hubs. Streaming services spend more on buying up movies, shows, IP rights, and other streaming services than their subscriptions bring in.

          The endgame of all this means everything will become unaffordably expensive for almost everyone, the services utterly nosedive in quality as companies cut costs and fire staff, or they go bankrupt and collapse. I think we’ve already had it as good as it’s gonna get and we’re going to go through a period of corporations slowly pulling back everything they’ve pushed into our lives with investor funding over the past decade. It’s not just Lemmy’s favorite buzzword “enshitification.” I think a lot of what we expect from the Internet is not sustainable and it’s not going to stick around in any form we would want.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The endgame of all this means everything will become unaffordably expensive for almost everyone, the services utterly nosedive in quality as companies cut costs and fire staff, or they go bankrupt and collapse.

            While you’ve got some reasonable points, I’m about 14 years into using exclusively the OS everyone tried to tell me would never be viable on the desktop as my only desktop OS, and have been able to find opportunities to deploy it in my day job also. Haven’t used Windows except when paid to in all that time.

            And we’re conversing here on Lemmy, which may be objectively “worse” than Reddit by some metrics, but not any metrics that matter to me, nor, I think, to the majority of its users.

            When I’m done typing this I’m going to fire up my Jellyfin client to connect to my free and open source Jellyfin media server, and watch some content on that system which does everything I’d ever hoped a media server would do, even though I was confidently told by many people when it first forked from Emby (after Emby was enshittified) that it would be dead in two years, and certainly could never begin to compete with Plex. (I have never missed Plex for a single minute since moving to Jellyfin)

            Those are just three recent examples that I could think of without much effort. As you may be thinking, all of them are far smaller in scale than youtube, and yet, all three of them are things that quite happily serve my needs without spying on me or requiring exorbitant fees to feed someone else’s greed. I can (and do) support them financially, and in other ways, because I choose to.

            I’m not listing more examples because I’m too lazy to, not because lots more don’t exist.

            More broadly, I grew up during the time when very nearly everything regarding using a personal computer really was controlled by corporations, and was exorbitantly expensive. I had a computer because I was privileged enough to have parents who could buy me one, but the only free or inexpensive things to do with it were: Piracy (via locally copying each others’ games in most cases), Bulletin Board Systems, and learning to program. Shareware and Freeware existed, but with some notable exceptions tended to be not so good for various reasons, and the selection was not especially broad.

            There was no free/cheap equivalent like the Raspberry Pi to play with, but if you really wanted to pinch pennies you could build a PC with a kit from Heathkit or Radio Shack, for a fee that was still out of reach for a great many people due to cost or skill. There was not a global internet where people could collaborate and teach each other, and to whatever degree things like BBSs and Quantumlink (which eventually became AOL) might have been capable of providing those sorts of interpersonal connections, the critical mass wasn’t there in a way that it is today.

            We have Linux. We have cheap and/or open hardware. We have a vast trove of Free (not just gratis: libre) software that anyone in the world can use to run on that hardware, and improve on their own without penalty. We can share knowledge with others at a rate unheard of for most individuals decades ago. We have numerous examples of users who keep such services and products going, and thriving, without needing to siphon money out of the public as fast as possible to appease shareholder value.

            I predict that any such collapse as you describe will be transient, and it will pass far more quickly than it would have in the past. We (gesturing broadly) have the technology, the capability, and (I think) the desire to move past reliance on many of these services and corporate-controlled environments, and various individuals are already doing so. What emerges on the other side after such a paradigm shift as you predict won’t be Youtube, but that won’t mean it’s a step backwards, either.

            we’re going to go through a period of corporations slowly pulling back everything they’ve pushed into our lives with investor funding over the past decade

            I’m not convinced that’s a bad thing overall.

            It’s not just Lemmy’s favorite buzzword “enshitification.”

            Enshittification is a concept that has a little bit more depth than just being Lemmy’s favorite buzzword.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification

            https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/

            • graymess@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I understand where you’re coming from. I’m not personally a Linux user despite a lot of what I value overlapping with the Linux community broadly. I do think much of the technology we use today can and should be replaced by open source alternatives and I’m optimistic about growing interest globally in that regard. I’m not at all suggesting we submit to the new corporate-controlled Internet or go back to a pre-2000s lifestyle.

              But I think we’re talking about different things, so let me just bring it back to YouTube. A lot of what we can do is limited by inescapable expenses: server costs and labor. We can say labor is optional because a lot of open source projects are developed and maintained by volunteers. But people do need money to live, so this project becomes the side gig, not the full time job. YouTube’s already a mess with moderation. Imagine a video platform with no full time staff to review illegal uploaded content, DMCA requests, comments, etc. But the bigger issue is the scale of YouTube, trying to make billions of videos play seamlessly at all times all over the world and just work. I can’t fathom the infrastructure needed for that. It would cost far more than it would make in donations if that was all it was accepting. No ads means the budget is that much smaller. If the small percentage of users with YouTube Premium doesn’t bring in enough to keep things running, the open source version wouldn’t either. And fewer people would be willing to pay for it.

              This is what I mean by services that are unsustainable. Yes, clearly the technology makes it possible. But there is a cost to it and I think we’re entering a time when we don’t get those things for free anymore.

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                I think the primary difference in our views is that I don’t think Youtube needs to be replaced by something like it to be replaced. I don’t claim to have a viable approach in mind, but I’m certain one exists.

                • graymess@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I would love a federated network of video platforms as long as they can all be searched collectively. Would be great if videos could even be migrated to other instances if storage becomes too limited on one of them. Yeah, it probably isn’t ideal that YouTube is all one platform, but it certainly makes it easy to find what you’re looking for most of the time.

    • gap_betweenus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Video hosting is still rather expensive, live streaming even more. Not sure that even youtube is profitable. Until some new tech comes along I think only amazon would be able to support some kind of viable alternative - and not sure they will be much better.

      • ImpulseDrive42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google “Odysee”.

        It’s currently my preferred YouTube alternative. Granted it obviously doesn’t have as much content as YouTube. But several well known content creators post to both YouTube and Odysee now.

        Some of the ones I follow include: Louis Rossman, Anton Petrov, SomeOrdinaryGamers, and Zach Star Himself. Just to name a few.

        And there’s also a browser extension called “Watch on Odysee” which adds a button to the YouTube video if the video is also found on Odysee so you can “watch on Odysee” instead of YouTube. Which can help you locate your favorite youtubers on the platform and let you follow them.

        And there is also an Odysee mobile app if you like watching videos on mobile.

        This is just one example, but I hope it helps ;-)

  • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been using youtube on Firefox with ublock since the premium price raise. Even on android. The experience is not great, but that makes sure I don’t have ads at all.

    Also discovered unhooked addon yesterday. Is desktop only, but great for going into less youtube rabbit holes that waste my time.

  • Karna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve Invidious hosted on my Little Raspberry Pi 4, and using it’s WPA app on every device I got.

    Zero ad + Decent UI + Access to highest video quality

    https://invidious.io/

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Peertube is planning on releasing an official app this year. Just thought I’d throw that out there.

  • Vincentvd@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I personally have no problem with paying for a service. However, if I buy premium to remove the ads, YT has no longer the need to collect my data. But it is Google and they won’t stop collecting. That, plus the fact that Google basically has a monopoly with youtube are the reasons I don’t buy premium.