Neo Mujico
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months ago

There was an attempt at scale.

mander.xyz

message-square
24
fedilink
327

There was an attempt at scale.

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
24
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 months ago

    30,000 is roughly 1/3 of 60,000,000.

    VERY roughly. Lol

    • DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Logarithmically scaled image. I’ll leave the determination of the base of the Log as an exercise for the viewer.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would show my proof, but I don’t have enough space in this margin

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s what I thought, so I investigated.

        The base of the log can be accounted for by a constant scale factor, because, for example, if n is the number of bison,

        log10(n)
        = log10(e^ln(n))
        = ln(n) log10(e) and log10(e) is a constant.
        This change of base is a linear scale on the logs.

        Hence we can just take log 10 of the numbers of bison, and scale the answer by a constant factor which is log10(correct base), getting
        7.778, 2.477 and 4.477
        Scale that by about 2 = log10(100) to match the 5 bison in the middle pictogram, and there should be
        16, 5, 9 bison on a logarithmic scale.

        The diagram is also wrong if it’s logarithmic.

      • ShotDonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        OBVIOUSLY!!

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s only off by roughly 20,000,000

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, we need 799613 more bison images to justify the graphic.

  • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The decision to stop was required, but a ton of work was done to help the population rebound. What kind of misguided message is this trying to send?

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think it gets the point across even if it’s off by orders of magnitude.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I get that, but I personally think 60,000,000 tiny buffalo would be more impactful. Can someone do a quick edit in Photoshop?

      • Balex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s not even 60,000,000 pixels in that image.

  • tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Each buffalo in the first picture represents 242,914 buffalo. Which means the last picture would be about 1/10th of a bison, and the middle one would be just the tip of a horn.

  • Fishy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Log scale?

    • expatriado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      graph designer “i don’t like math” scale

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    TIL There are 30,000 free roaming bison but there are 500,000 total including privately owned and commercial herds.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think this is to scale.

    • Plebajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree. Bison are much larger than that.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are you sure?

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait. I need to know more about the Aperture Science dinosaur in 1889.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    So I’m not bothered by the inconsistent scale… but why is there a dinosaur peeking through the bottom of the 1889 column?!

  • Jaimesmith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not perfect recovery, but still a powerful reminder that “too late” isn’t always true. Stopping the damage is step one.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Removed by mod

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    THERE! ARE! FOUR! LIGHTS BISONS!!

    • eyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are 300 bison! presses button*

  • Trex202@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I thought this was about vaccines until I read the bottom.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags

  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • RESOURCES


Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: “Is this a science meme?”

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn’t need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn’t a filing cabinet of facts, it’s a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what’s under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.07K users / day
  • 1.64K users / week
  • 3.35K users / month
  • 8.13K users / 6 months
  • 9 local subscribers
  • 20.7K subscribers
  • 6.36K Posts
  • 41.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • UI: 0.19.10
  • BE: 0.19.16
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org