Please keep related news in this thread rather than making separate posts. Remember to include sources and avoid spreading rumours.

Previous megathread

    • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      Speculation (assuming this is new policy at all):

      • They’re afraid they’re going to get taken out themselves, so they’re trying to cause as much damage on the way out as possible.
      • They’re taking damage to the point that it’s becoming harder to carry out operations in a coordinated way, so they’re trying to decentralize more so.

      Could be wishful thinking on my part that it’s a sign of desperation, but if this is out of the ordinary as policy, it’s gotta be for some reason and I don’t think it would be driven by confidence in capability to control outcomes.

      • Malkhodr @lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        They don’t have to be dead to be panicked. The zionist got themselves into a war They have no control over and every day their capabilities degrade is a tick on the clock for the Palestinians to liberate themselves.

        • Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          Sure but on top of the “proof of life” AI videos? If you start with the idea that bibi is dead, an order to kill every Iranian leader on sight feels like an attempt at retaliation. In practice it is no change because they already try to kill every single Iranian they see.

          If bibi is still alive what motivation does he have to give up his direct participation in the assassinations? The only proven value of assassinations is a boost in political support for the individual who can claim credit. He can’t take credit for killing leaders if the policy is kill on sight. His only motivation is maintaining political support so he cant be tried for his corruption scandals.