• 62 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 7 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2019

help-circle




  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlMtoMemes@lemmygrad.ml•Solarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Even the non-repressive function of states need hierarchies. All administration needs specialists, managers, organization.

    Think of a hospital, or a large-scale engineering project. There is no conceivable way these could be run without hierarchies and centralized control.


  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlMtoMemes@lemmygrad.ml•Solarpunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    Central coordination without a state hierarchy is entirely possible.

    Its not a state, its a insert extremely convoluted term that does everything a state does

    These gentlemen think when they have changed the names of things, they have changed the things themselves. That is how these profound thinkers mock the whole world.

    • Engels














  • The USA genocided an entire continent under it’s current form of government, and committed and is still committing countless other atrocities. Look at what Europe did to Africa and Asia under that same form.

    Bourgeois parliamentarism is a much more stable shell for colonialism than any other form of government has proven to be. Demonizing a dead form of colonialism (fascism) lets them off the hook, and never forces them to look at what their own governments are currently doing. They get to keep their chauvinist / supremacist myth about “liberal democracy” being the superior form of government, without challenging it.


  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mltoMemes@lemmy.ml•on our way to fascism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I need to make a bot to post this any time fascism gets mentioned.


    The western left’s use of the term fascism, is borderline white-supremacist at this point. Fascism was a form of colonialism that died by the 1940s, and is only allowed to be demonized in public discourse, because it was a form of colonialism directed also against white europeans. It was defeated, and Germany / Italy / Japan reverted to the more stable form of government for colonialism (practiced by the US, UK, France, the Netherlands, Australia, etc): bourgeois parliamentarism.

    British, european, and now US colonizers were doing the exact same thing, and killing far more people for hundreds of years in the global south, yet you don’t hear ppl scared of their countries potentially "adopting parliamentary democracy”. They haven’t changed, and their wealth is still propped up by surplus value theft from the super-exploitation of hundreds of millions of low-paid global south proletarians.

    This is why you have new leftists terrified that the UK or US or europe “might turn fascist!!”, betraying that the atrocities propagated by those empires against the global south was and is completely acceptable.

    Make no mistake about it: parliamentary / bourgeois democracy is not only a more stable form of government, it’s also far more effective at carrying out colonialism, and killing millions of innocent people.