I hope it’s just a joke

  • Yttra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It looks fine, I guess…? Then again, I thought the old design was fine as it was…

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For the love of Odin can I please get a title and menu bar.

    When you have tabs across the screen where would you click and hold to drag the window?

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t know people actually liked title bars eating up a window’s vertical space.
      Firefox specifically adds a bit of padding either side of said tabs in non-maximised windows.

    • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago
      1. Open the page “about:config” in your address bar.
      2. Search for “browser.tabs.inTitlebar”.
      3. Set it to “0”.
  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    the old one is fine

    i don’t think the ui is your main problem, mozilla, but ok i guess.

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    No thank you. I like Firefox the way it is. I hate big changes for the sake of designers keeping their jobs changing my tools and workflow and making things ugly.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really like it, I feel like it fixes some of the issues with groups and tabs looking a bit weird currently. Lol, I always like Firefox redesigns and really cannot understand how people go apeshit when that happens. I swear some people would use NetScape GUI if they could.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I agree overall it looks nice, I hate gaps and rounded corners. I’m sick of wasted space. And I’m sick of rounded corners.

      I swear some people would use NetScape GUI if they could.

      Now that would actually be nice!!

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        i think the space is the same but its just camouflaged to look like it’s wasted, maybe we should count the pixels tho

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think pixel count would be a fair comparison for a 30 year old browser. You used to actually be able to count all the pixels back then.

    • solrize@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mostly we want them to make the browser itself not suck before worrying about cosmetics.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ultimately I just need Firefox to always support about:config, manifest v2 compatibility, and userChrome.css and userContent.css.

    That said, usually changes like these break my extremely minimal redesign and configs I have on my desktop. So… boo, Mozilla, boo…

    • flameleaf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      userContent.css is absolutely essential for me. I use that to limit the size of images on Thunderbird.

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ultimately I just need Firefox to always support about:config, manifest v2 compatibility, and userChrome.css and userContent.css.

      Isn’t userchrome.cc already deprecated for quite some time?

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’d be news to me, I’ve used the same userChrome.css and userContent.css for years now and I keep my Gentoo Linux desktop up to date with weekly updates, so the Firefox I’m using is confirmed to be the latest version.

        Additionally, a quick search on ddg reveals no recent mentions nor plans for deprecation of the feature as far as I can tell.

  • jwt@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m thoroughly convinced UI designers are under the impression we cut ourselves on sharp corners.

  • OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like this a lot! However I hope they keep the userChrome function because as nice as it is I’m going to keep my LibAdwaita skin anyways.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Old Firefox looked perfectly fine. I don’t know why they keep wasting so many resources on changing something that already worked.

  • xcjs@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is way too much white-space in this design. I’m tired of getting higher resolution displays only to lose that resolution to applications that get chunkier.

  • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The mobile client and fork I use both have that design language now. It’s a little cutesy for me and I dislike having to click twice to get the full menu but otherwise no complaints.