“We tested the aerodynamics of dogs in search of answers.”
“What was the question?”
“The results are that some dogs are very aerodynamic.”
“WHAT WAS THE QUESTION??”
How are mongolian dogs able to withstand the harsh mongolian steppe winds without falter ?
Possible applications in biomimetism :
- building tanks and airplanes shaped like mongolian dogs for steppe warfare
- ??..?
Even in the most basic research having an hypothesis is important, even just to say “I was completely wrong, but in the end extremely lucky and found something I didn’t expect nobody cares about”.
Hypothesis Aerodynamics experimentation does not damage internal organs of dogs.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that wind tunnels are not dangerous to the well being of dogs. Such findings open new research opportunities in the field of dog aerodynamics.
The question was “who’s a good dog?”
what dog is best for racing
To determine optimal wall dimensions against invading doggos.
Science tackles the ultimate question - who’s a good boy?
*fast boi
Congratulations you have proven that dogs are aerodynamic. I don’t know why this was relevant or who it was relevant to, but there it is.
Windog!
Yes.
“In windy environments does evolution optimize dogs for aerodynamics?”
Looks like the answer is yes
“Is it fuckin wimdy?”
