Ross Wolfe tackles Domenico Losurdo’s work as “a new school of falsification, all in service of justifying the course history has taken. Everything he wrote had to align with the geopolitical interests of [a] few nominally socialist states […]”
Ross Wolfe tackles Domenico Losurdo’s work as “a new school of falsification, all in service of justifying the course history has taken. Everything he wrote had to align with the geopolitical interests of [a] few nominally socialist states […]”
I finally got around to reading this, and there’s nothing of substance here. After reading every sentence and paragraph, you realize there’s no point being made in any of them, just a lot of references to authors and publishing houses with no real point.
Really vague references to Losurdo being wrong, but never what he’s specifically being wrong about.