Like, maybe not because of censorship per se, but maybe for abusing their power as an oligopoly or going against the desire of their users?
Like, maybe not because of censorship per se, but maybe for abusing their power as an oligopoly or going against the desire of their users?
The complaints against their existence go back more than a decade.
But since money is speech, they’ve lobbied against all regulation against them or the creation of public alternatives