• TheCompliantCitizen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    12 days ago

    Owning 1 extra property and renting: Okay

    Owning apartment complex and renting: Okay

    Owing millions of single family homes and duplexes and rent hiking/price hiking the entire market: not okay

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Owning 1 slave: Okay

      Owning a dozen slaves: Okay

      Owning hundreds of slaves: not okay.

      /s obviously

      /uj

      Of course slavery and landlordism aren’t identical in every respect, but they both are based on a parasite class doing no work, and extracting labor value from people who do. Large-scale vs small-scale doesn’t make landlording any more ethical.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        12 days ago

        Do you have a problem with public housing or are landlords okay when it’s the state?

        • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          12 days ago

          Publicly-owned and controlled housing is the solution to this problem, yes. Then rents, upkeep, and all housing questions are determined at the level of public/political decision-making and not by petty tyrant landlords acting only in the interests of profit.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          You support this alternative with completely a completely different dynamic and incentives??

          Another win for pithy internet hypocracy gotcha debatelord!