For those of you who travel in the united states, you’ll know they now have facial recognition scans when checking your id. You can opt out by telling them you don’t want to take the picture. I do every time, but I wonder what the point of the scan is if you can just opt out. That given, why do you think they do it? What prevents them from forcing you to do it?

To those of you who live outside of the united states, have you seen a similar increase in security at your airports?

  • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    They want to scan so they can refuse flights to non-fascists.

    It’s as simple as that. They want to police your very existence.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Palantir, which the US gov is now (let’s not kid ourselves, has been for some time illegally) contracting, probably already has your face either from street cams, security cams in various company buildings, or from social media at this point, so letting you ‘opt out’ is probably just theatre to avoid angering people at airports.

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    There is little point in refusing it. The biometrics are already in the database - the scan uses them to let you in without using your passport. Refusing to use the system will not take your data out of the database.

    • wuphysics87@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Domestic flights within the united states still require an id. They recently (in may iirc) require you use a “real id”. I guess those are harder to conterfeit, but still they strengthened the traditional id requirement recently, so I expect that to remain the standard, at least for a while

  • edel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    For visa holders and green cards they have been doing that for a decade at least, I wonder if it is optional for them too.

    Regarding opting out, we should. It is inconvenient, we get faces, but we should.

    1. The more scans they get of your face (age, expressions,…) , the more accurate their profile of you will be…
    2. To make an statement. If we just accept these things, they will keep pushing for more.
  • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unrelated to the question but this makes me think the US is so cooked for not having trainlines. I haven’t flown for years and glad I haven’t

      • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No worries, it’s understandable. And I don’t blame people. Especially for not taking a train that does not exist

  • dingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Weird. I haven’t flown recently. What happens if you get plastic surgery or into an accident or something?