In light of Mozilla’s recent policy changes, we no longer feel assured that Firefox aligns with our commitment to protect your privacy. This prompted us to revisit the choice of default web browser in Zorin OS 17.3.

  • off@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    one of the worst distros ever so I guess this is pretty obvious choice and telling to some.

  • Peasley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Mozilla has a bit been shady lately, so we are making the difficult decision to change our default browser to something significantly more shady. We are confident our users will feel safer knowing their data is in even worse hands than before"

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    the everyday linux distro that is famous for asking people for money for their pro version, cause they know most of the userbase is coming from windows and doesnt know that everything is free?

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Brave marketing has gone crazy to convince people it’s less dodgy than Firefox. Come on!

    • F04118F@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      While the company has a questionable record and a controversial business model, Brave Browser is an open-source browser with good privacy features.

      • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You could replace “Brave Browser” with Firefox and the statement would still be true.

        At least Firefox wasn’t caught hijacking affiliate links.

        • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Something ive actually wondered is if firefox is hurting for money so bad why doesnt it allow a toggle where a user can willingly just turn every purchase via the browser into a firefox affiliate link? If the user is approving it and its not a shady forced thing i see no issue with it, and it would generate plenty of revenue without needing to be beholden to ad companies or google. It’d be like allowing users to donate, without actually costing them any extra money, everytime they make an online purchase.

          • Shareni@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Instead of thinking up new ways for them to make money, maybe think why they’ve got money issues.

            Maybe it’s got something to do with the different CEOs doubling their multi-milion salaries every few years.

            Or maybe their numerous idiotic acquisitions like the pocket.

            Or maybe they’re super strapped for cash because they moved their fuckhead of a CEO to AI development.

            I love FF, but fuck Mozilla and everything it represents.

            Also, fun stats from the moz corp wiki:

            • Revenue in 2023: $653 million
            • Software development expenses in 2023: $260 million
            • Total expenses in 2023: $496 million
            • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah i mean true if its just an issue with their org then thats a different case. I do think that sort of money making model would work well though so maybe it could be used to fund a new browser.

          • markinov@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Will it be legal? Recently honey extension was caught doing this, though without user consent.

            Even with user consent, would businesses work with firefox affiliate if it is not actually attracting sales, but taking a portion of sales, and thus reducing profit, just because the sale is made through the browser?

            Firefox tried “privacy friendly ad” but that has also received community backslash because it turns users into products and doing anything like that would make their profit engine go boom and exploit private data. Wouldn’t the similar backslash also apply in affiliated sales?

            • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              The way i see it if its opt in theres no issue. This would be something that wouldn’t happen unless you manually turned it on.

  • Unmapped@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m actually not familiar with this distro. But if I installed a Linux distro, and it had brave installed. I would immediately switch.

  • juipeltje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Seems like a strange choice. If anything i would’ve expected them to just use a firefox fork or something.

    • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Zen is literally the best browser around right now, I do understand the UI isn’t for everybody but if you vibe with it, it rocks

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The distro sucks anyway. They ship really fucking old packages, even more so than Debian or other stable distros.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is marketed as direct windows replacement, so it appears they choose absolute safety, over possible breakage. If that GRID product they tout ever launches it will be great for companies.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          We see SUSE and REL at corps and enterprises, not so much Ubuntu. None offer something like GRID though. Central management tool for Admins to deploy all systems equally from central location, with dashboard view, without having to run scripts or autoYAST to keep systems the same

          • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ubuntu is deployed all over the place for data science.

            I’m fairly sure this is because data scientists got used to running it on their personal machines and can’t be bothered to learn another distro.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ubuntu made Linux easily accessible to anyone, so you are probably right.

              For the enterprise stuff we work with only REL and SUSE are certified to install on, and work with the software. OpenSUSE works too because of the shared binaries with SUSE