In light of Mozilla’s recent policy changes, we no longer feel assured that Firefox aligns with our commitment to protect your privacy. This prompted us to revisit the choice of default web browser in Zorin OS 17.3.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    Brave marketing has gone crazy to convince people it’s less dodgy than Firefox. Come on!

  • juipeltje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Seems like a strange choice. If anything i would’ve expected them to just use a firefox fork or something.

  • Peasley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Mozilla has a bit been shady lately, so we are making the difficult decision to change our default browser to something significantly more shady. We are confident our users will feel safer knowing their data is in even worse hands than before"

  • Unmapped@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m actually not familiar with this distro. But if I installed a Linux distro, and it have brave installed. I would immediately switch.

    • F04118F@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      While the company has a questionable record and a controversial business model, Brave Browser is an open-source browser with good privacy features.

      • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You could replace “Brave Browser” with Firefox and the statement would still be true.

        At least Firefox wasn’t caught hijacking affiliate links.

        • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Something ive actually wondered is if firefox is hurting for money so bad why doesnt it allow a toggle where a user can willingly just turn every purchase via the browser into a firefox affiliate link? If the user is approving it and its not a shady forced thing i see no issue with it, and it would generate plenty of revenue without needing to be beholden to ad companies or google. It’d be like allowing users to donate, without actually costing them any extra money, everytime they make an online purchase.

          • Shareni@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Instead of thinking up new ways for them to make money, maybe think why they’ve got money issues.

            Maybe it’s got something to do with the different CEOs doubling their multi-milion salaries every few years.

            Or maybe their numerous idiotic acquisitions like the pocket.

            Or maybe they’re super strapped for cash because they moved their fuckhead of a CEO to AI development.

            I love FF, but fuck Mozilla and everything it represents.

            Also, fun stats from the moz corp wiki:

            • Revenue in 2023: $653 million
            • Software development expenses in 2023: $260 million
            • Total expenses in 2023: $496 million
            • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 minutes ago

              Yeah i mean true if its just an issue with their org then thats a different case. I do think that sort of money making model would work well though so maybe it could be used to fund a new browser.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The distro sucks anyway. They ship really fucking old packages, even more so than Debian or other stable distros.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It is marketed as direct windows replacement, so it appears they choose absolute safety, over possible breakage. If that GRID product they tout ever launches it will be great for companies.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          We see SUSE and REL at corps and enterprises, not so much Ubuntu. None offer something like GRID though. Central management tool for Admins to deploy all systems equally from central location, with dashboard view, without having to run scripts or autoYAST to keep systems the same

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Not sure why they don’t just ship Firefox with extensions like uBlock pre-installed

    Edit: it looks like they’re heavily tweaking Brave regardless. I doubt this move was for technical reasons

  • Jakob Fel@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I hope to see more distros do this. Strongly considering buying a Pro license just to support them for doing the right thing. Screw Mozilla.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I dunno that I’d consider Brave to be “the right thing” but more variety/competition is best!