• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    At my company we allocate 20% of our time on “Better engineering”, and it counts as impact when you’re up for bonuses/raises so people actually have a reason to push to do it

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      i saw something like this once and their source was the neatest and most professional i’ve ever seen and it’s convinced me that this is the only way refactoring ever happens.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Worst part is when the un-refactored code continues to confuse other devs, meaning it keeps causing additional work, but you still don’t get time to actually fix it.

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Commit1: actual change
      Commit2: this code is so misleading and I have to refactor it refactors
      Me: painfully rejects PR the story said nothing about refactoring…

  • jade52@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t forget about the fabled but often discussed “tech debt sprint”.