• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ok but also you aren’t nonbinary just because you’re an effeminate man. They’re different things entirely

    • tan00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can’t gatekeep being nonbinary. Not unless you’re prepared to define it explicitly, which will exclude many people - and not everyone will agree with your definition either.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I said just because. Not that effeminate men aren’t capable of being nonbinary, merely that it is not sufficient (or necessary for that matter). You have to like actually not identify as entirely a man.

        But it’s not my place to fight I’m very much in the binary side of transness.

        • tan00k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Whose authority says it’s not sufficient? If they say they are nonbinary, they are nonbinary.

      • chetradley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Telling someone whose gender doesn’t conform to the male/female binary view of gender that the term non-binary is a “shit pseudophilosophical concept” that “has no connection to reality” fucking sucks. Either you don’t recognize gender outside of the binary, or you just think these people don’t deserve a way to express and talk about their gender. Either way it’s a garbage take.