You’ve all had some very interesting answers for my last post so here is a question for you, how do you think about copyright in general and should it exist?

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Copyright should exist but not the forever bullshit that Disney made it in the 20th century.

    An artist should have the right to copyright their work for a reasonable time to be able to profit from it. Say 25 years, after that is becomes public domaine.

    Copyright should not be transferable nor inheritable.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Copyright should not be transferable nor inheritable.

      Personally I think it’s reasonable for it to be inheritable as long as we’re talking about the relatively short timeframe that copyright was originally supposed to last. The prototypical example is the poor artist who creates a much-loved and successful work shortly before death; should their partner not be entitled to live off the proceeds of that?

      Personally, my preference would be for 20 years, full stop. But I think a reasonable compromise position would be 20 years or the lifetime of the author, whichever is longer. Corporate-owned works and works-for-hire only get 20 years.

      • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think heritage should exist.

        It would solve so many problems.

        Why should I inherit, but not someone else? Why should rich people inherit lots, the poor nothing? Where I live, the median age to inherit is 59. Think about it, how is that useful for society?

        Otherwise I’m on the same track.

          • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because we’re all in one society I guess (I mean at least per country). It’s a bit like ask why can’t super rich people hoard up all the value.

            I mean why should some random humans get a head start in society, and others not?

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              So what do you think someone to do with everything they worked their life for?

              Are we not at least entitled to give our children a better Headstart then we had?

              Isn’t that the fucking goal?

              • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Well yes obviously!

                Why “hoard” it? Why not give it to your kids when they are young, and thus helping them, instead of having the possibility to keep it and give it to your 59 yo child(ren)?

                • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I am giving what I can to them while I can but when I die they deserve the things I work for more than some random.

                  If they want they can sell it or donate them but they are my items to do with what I please.

                  If a law like that passes people will just transfer before they die and then let their “children’s assets” support them.