• linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    the communist in me yearns to blame capitalism for everything, and its sort of their fault but not directly, the actual reason that nutritional content is going down is because plants are growing faster and bigger while taking a similar amount of nutrients because there is more co2 in the air, its not really about business pressures or anything to do with specific decisions being made by corporations or farmers and the difference is irrelevant anyways (for now).

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      But it does boil down to business pressures. The business prefers more and bigger produce to more nutritional produce.

      Is that a bad thing? Maybe not. Maybe you can just eat more to get your nutrition since higher yield should reduce cost.

      But the point still stands that there is very little business pressure to make a nutritious product.

      • Jayjader@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        In my ideal world, the population would be sufficiently educated about nutrition in fruit and vegetables that picture-perfect tomatoes that are picked unripe so that they survive long distance hauling would simply never sell.

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even then how you you know? I don’t think anyone can reliably look at a vegetable and tell you how nutritious it is. I don’t think it is reasonable to have the general population being experts in evaluating vegetables.

          I think what could work here is mandated labeling. This is required for most foods but generally not produce. I think there are some reasonable reasons for this, but for farms producing huge volumes it seems that occasional testing that gets reported at the store would make sense.