Out of a reflex of distrust, I refuse to participate in any kind of loyalty program of the outlet of the large retail store around the corner.

I tell myself that by refusing to join the loyalty program (which basically comes down to scanning an anonymous loyalty card every time I make a purchase), I prevent them from adding my correlations (what products I buy, in what combos, at what time) to their data.

But since I normally pay by card, I guess they can (and do) already do that with my bank account information?

If I would pay with cash, they can still see those correlations per purchase, but they can’t track my purchases over time?

  • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think paying in cash cuts down on trackin massively. Can you still be tracked? Yes. But are most stores going through the effort? I don’t think so. Depends on the store too, I guess.

    Maybe my tin foil hat is getting rusty, but to me it just feels like they’ll just move on to the next dude who payed by card instead.

    • notsofunnycomment@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does that mean that anonymous loyalty cards don’t really add any extra tracking capabilities?

      Then what is the benefit for retailers? That some people don’t use those cards and are thus paying too much?

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Loyalty cards are more for getting the customer in the door, right? Usage patterns come second if I understand the model correctly.

        • Alex@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Other way around. Loyalty cards have always been about getting that sweet sweet data about customer habits.