• 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    This shit actually hurts my soul. This is the type of shit as to why we might not make it. We have the technology to mitigate climate change yet we don’t because those in power don’t want to see their power decrease. It’s a serious reason why we might not make it. How do we even begin to take direct action? I really have no clue, this entire planet, life as we know it, is entirely fucked if we don’t do something soon. The US government gave billions to implement charging infrastructure and the corps did jack SHIT with it, the government has become the corps fuck pig, bent over dishing out money while getting fucked.

    • set_secret@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Might not make it? Sorry man we’re literally looking down the barrel of end times.

      Human greed can only be stopped when the earth has nothing left to give.

      This is the reality we all exist in and 99% of us are powerless to change it, unless we all collectively agree to (spoiler we’re not gunna).

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      bro we’re so far past this lol

      it’s been too late for probably a decade now, get ready to starve cuz there’s only a couple years left

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nothing surprising.

    EVs have been developed since the 90s at least as far as I know, and progress on them has been sabotaged at nearly every turn by the industry.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wasn’t aware of that. My thoughts were more towards the EV1, although I assume there were many others before that.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re referring to how Thomas Edison created the first electric vehicles back in the 1800s. They might have had a future until Ford introduced assembly lines. Then the rest is history.

          The EV1 was the first commercial development in the US following the World Wars, but even before then you had solar EVs being made for science and eclectic racing before then. Think of those weirdly shaped cars only made for 1 driver that have solar panels covering the entire body of the car.

          Funny thing is that we’re now seeing some commercial (or soon to be commercial) manufacturers add solar panels in the same way. Just look to Hyundai and Aptera.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I remember an early Saturn EV that was never sold, only leased so GM could maintain ownership of them. Even with a limited range, the drivers all loved them for commuting and running errands, and many tried to purchase them outright, which GM refused. Eventually, GM issued a mandatory recall for all the Saturn EVs, mothballed the project, and then they released the Hummer… made me sick even at the time.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    is that purely because they can’t make them well or is there another reason?

    honestly the japanese EV ive been in felt decent?

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Japan doesn’t have enough electricity. After Fukushima, they lost most of their nuclear. The country is densely populated, and the parts that aren’t populated are covered in forested mountains, which all makes building the required amount of renewables very difficult. So today and in the future, Japan runs on coal and natural gas. So they make cars that run on hydrogen (which is more efficient to create out of their imported natural gas than burning the gas for electricity) and then sell those abroad greenwashed as “but you can produce hydrogen from green electricity!”

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The margins are thinner. There’s almost no resale value. Someone might buy a 60k car and eat the payments for a few years, knowing that they can sell it any time for a decent price.

      Buying a 60k EV is more like setting your money on fire. The car might be fine, great even, but it just won’t hold it’s value.

        • TrumpetX@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is what I’ve done on my last 2 cars. First was a Leaf that I leased dirt cheap. The second was a used Tesla at more than 1/2 off. I’m looking at a truck now and finding amazing deals on the '23 F150 lightnings. I’d prefer a Rivian and I’m not quite ready to let my Tesla go, but soooooon.

          Someday, the deals will be harder to find, but for now take advantage!

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Those are reasons people don’t want to buy EVs, not reasons for companies to sabotage the change over.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Companies give zero fucks about anything but money.

          Completely retooling for EVs is expensive with a lot of risk. And they’ll make less money afterwards…

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        why is that? i don’t think lithium batteries degrade THAT fast?

        if the used market had these dirt cheap evs here id probably be considering them. scratch that there is no way to charge them in my country unless you live in a house, or unless you can use regular power outlets hahaha

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      The tariffs were explicitly to protect them. To prevent them from having to compete. We’re about to eat a lot of shit.

          • buzz86us@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The issue I’m seeing here is that there isn’t anything to protect legacy auto does not make a product that is remotely comparable

  • dropped_the_chief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    We’re all going to fry in old age. Our children are going to become sterile. Who tf knows what’s going to happen to whatever ppl make it past that.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Now that we’ve trained the whole world in american-style corporate criminality, we’re gonna pull the rug out from them and reveal ourselves to be the good guys! Right? Right, guys?

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Blame everyone but your SUV driving selves. The devil made you do it Im sure.

  • StaySquared@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m only buying Toyota because it didn’t get sucked into the stupid EV craze. They have common sense. The U.S. doesn’t even have the electrical grid to currently manage many parts of the U.S., especially California. How tf are we going to introduce a product that will require electricity, straining the electrical grid further beyond its capacity? It’s fkin nonsense.

    Not to mention… the number of EVs (Teslas) that were having battery failures during the Winter in the midwest. And this last Winter was mild.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only reason Toyota is pushing back against EV is because they are so heavily invested in hydrogen powered vehicles, which isn’t going to happen.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        And still proudly producing gas powered vehicles which I will continue to outfit my family with.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nobody is going to upgrade the grid, if there is no prospect of increased demand.

      I’ve noticed that media tend to bitch equally about both surplus and shortage of certain commodities. Expensive power? Horrible! Cheap power? Catastrophe! That way the world seems even more depressing than it really is.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They should be upgrading the grid as the population and demand for electricity increases ahead of time. This is how it works in the tech world. We set the base for the upgrade and then commit to the upgrade with fall back / disaster recovery plan.

        • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Check when the last time an installed utility performed maintenance. Now you want them to turn things off while they put in new hardware? The only thing that will drive a business to make that kind of change is if the money is behind it, which will happen when EVs are much more prevalent.

          • StaySquared@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not from all the profits made by all the people using electricity and paying for electricity? And electrical grid has redundancy. You can take down primary and secondary takes over temporarily.

          • baru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Why would they need to turn anything off? That’s not how they expand capacity in the Netherlands. Why would it be needed?

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        Cool… I’ll buy an EV when both EV and electrical grid issues have been resolved. Until then… LOL

    • Clanket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Been driving a VW ID4 for 3 years in Ireland. They’re lovely to drive. Zero battery issues, zero charging issues. The future is electric.