• -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Because they aren’t “fascist” as another user said. They are still an anti-imperialist country with backwards/regressive social policies (quite literally regressive from the USSR). They aren’t even a “fascist” state in the traditional sense, as much as Putin holds power there are significant opposition parties that face typical capitalist prosecution and compete with capitalist interests. Yes, heavy prosecution exists but aren’t totally eliminated as you would see in a nationalist or national socialist regime. Imperialism is fascism; their LGBTQ rights are regressive but compare the incarceration numbers in America alone to Russia.

    What point are you trying to illustrate by pointing out their regressive social policies?

    • Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What point are you trying to illustrate by pointing out their regressive social policies?

      I got the impression from OP that Russia was above reproach and were entitled to uncritical support. This was mostly a knee-jerk response…

      • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        18 hours ago

        We use and live the term critical support around here. You can support a party/nation/group for their fight against, say, the primary global contradiction of imperialism and fascism, while being critical of other behaviours or contradictions, say capitalist organization of the economy or treatment of minority groups.