CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?message-squaremessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down15
arrow-up153arrow-down1message-squareWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square64fedilink
minus-squareVelvetStorm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 months agoInterview with a vampire. The book was good but the movie was better imo.
minus-squareAlphaOmega@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoIt’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire. Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoIt’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "
minus-squareVelvetStorm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoOmg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
Interview with a vampire. The book was good but the movie was better imo.
Mandela effect?
What?
It’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire.
Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
It’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "
Omg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.