Why would it be a bad sign that the language has built in tools for common things you need to do?
Why would it be a bad sign that the language has built in tools for common things you need to do?
And that’s why I like the “disappointing, good, awesome” scale. You only have three options and people generally know where to sort things.
No certifications, no degrees, just good, old fashioned 15 years of experience.
Science: The poison is in the dose.
Language: It’s a good joke, I love it!
Mostly so you can look at someone’s system and immediately know how many years old their software is.
Once version numbers get this high and you have stable multi year development, you might as well switch to “2024.1” style versioning.
It’s way grosser as a vertebrate. Yikes
I think he’s likely an invertebrate, no bones required.
AI does mean something, but it’s quite disappointing.
Even mundane algorithms like A* pathfinding are technically under the umbrella of Artificial Intelligence. However the public’s perception of what AI means constantly shifts to be “whatever computers can’t do today”.
AI isn’t a scam, but damn, most of the businesses surrounding it sure are.
Maybe this will convince NASA to let the Polaris missions reboost Hubble.
Unlikely, we’ve seen Iranian drones in action in Ukraine and they’re not particularly special. I bet Israel shoots them all down.
Surely this is a user experience that could be improved, no? Awesome feature but confusing solution.
You don’t think that listening to subject matter experts is a wise way to determine truth? By all means, enlighten us with a more consistent strategy.
I’d take anything published by Jerusalem Post as inherently incapable of being unbiased about Israel/Palestine. Let’s wait for a third party confirmation before making this claim.
Okay what the fuck is wrong with browsers and having the stupidest hotkeys? NO, I would NOT like a shortcut for saving the webpage as html. Please disable ctrl-s by default!
GDPR requires deleting data if you ask them to delete data. How did they get your email address if they supposedly deleted your information?
Yeah I realize now I responded to a thread about traffic lights instead of systems in general. Obviously centralized systems are far superior for that.
Because it’s a trustless system. In order to override the system you have to take over 50% of the nodes, and in large enough systems it’s infeasible to get that much compute power. This means that no one person or organization can actually control the destiny of the system, only the consensus can.
I can’t believe that here, in the fediverse of all places, we need to have a discussion about the benefits of having a system that corporations can’t control.
I’d really love if somebody would give GIMP the Blender treatment. It’s very good software but some of the UI paradigms are quite outdated. All their floating windows and dialogs do not work well on multiple screens.