• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Print needs ()”

    Oh fuck off. years of code that cannot be easily redone in ANY editor. Whoever OCDd that into python 3 needs to have their asshole kicked up into their mouth.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is so true & unfortunately everyone keeps telling beginners to start at Python

  • Machindo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some people in the comments didn’t take it as tongue-in-cheek as I did. 😝

    I thought this was really funny. That’s a good collection of toe stubs.

    There is a lot of stuff to learn to be good at python but I still love it.

  • dudinax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Best scientific packages in the open source by far, a library for everything, everybody knows it. Works on all kinds of systems. Available by default in many OSs.

    You might not like it, but you can’t leave.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The summary that I liked from the last post was “python is the second best language for everything”. There’s always something specialized and better for every given job. But, if you want one tool that’ll do a solid job everywhere, python is your go to.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I literally used to say this last decade, but as I grew experienced with more languages/paradigms/systems, it became 3rd best, then 4th, until I realized it actually not really great at anything other than there is an large ecosystem around it (wildly varying in quality). To some that might be enough, & going outside what you know isn’t typically the most wise thing to do, but it’s not particularly simple, or readble, or performance, or composable, or offering great patterns. Anything that used Python in Nixpkgs tend to be the most unreliable software for actually building & using.

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can’t speak for the science libraries as I’ve never used em, and I’ll gladly just blindly accept that as truth, but for everything else it’s always a pain in the ass. For being designed to “run on anything” it sure is funny that 90% of the time I download a python app it doesn’t fucking work and requires me to look up and manually setup a specific environment for it. Doesn’t help that the error messages are usually completely random and unrelated to this…

      I always dread when some fucking madman makes the installer for their app in python, knowing it’ll probably fail… God forbid it’s a script that’s supposed to modify something else. Always a good time for reflection upon the choices that led me to this point.

      Even my old scripts I kept around for sentimental value. Half of those don’t work either, and I can’t be bothered to figure out what version I made em for.

      I tried my best to scrub python from my pc out of principle, but as you say, it’s soo common my distro uses it as a dependency, fucking bullshit!

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess I don’t know. Whenever something tempts me to R, I quickly find that Python’s got a good-enough solution.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          R is better if you want some very specific, niche statistical packages.

          Python is better if you want to combine statistics with any other compute process.

        • menemen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Same for me with python, I always fall back to R after 10 minutes of trying to do it in python. :)

  • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The thing that annoys me the most is how it cares about whitespace/carriage returns. I remember back in college when I was taking a CS class, learning Python and writing the Code on a Windows PC, emailing it to myself, and then attempting to run the code on Linux. Before I learned about the carriage return conversions, I remember having to rewrite about 75 lines of code before I got it to run. 🤬

  • brettvitaz@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very little of this is uniquely a problem in Python. It seems to me that your problem is with software development in general.

  • DerArzt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    For how popular of a language python is, at this point it’s a bad sign to me that the language has default way to manage versions and create new projects. I get having options, but options are annoying to new folk.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly also annoying as a not-so-new folk. I just thought about this yesterday, I reasonably expect to clone a random project from the internet written Java, Rust et al, and to be able to open it in my IDE and look at it.

      Meanwhile, a Python project from two years ago that I helped to build, I do not expect to be able to reasonably view in an IDE at all. I remember, we gave up trying to fix all the supposedly missing dependencies at some point…

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why would it be a bad sign that the language has built in tools for common things you need to do?

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m guessing, they meant to write “that the language has no default way”.