Completing the circle with le citron de Menton, that is mild and sweet enough to be eaten raw with the peel. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20220328-the-return-of-frances-lost-menton-lemon
I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
Completing the circle with le citron de Menton, that is mild and sweet enough to be eaten raw with the peel. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20220328-the-return-of-frances-lost-menton-lemon
I see they like serious gourmet shit.
The fact that we can’t see his left fin is a strong indicator.
When your family is so brilliant they die from it.
It does hijack your cellular machinery to mine its own building instruction hashes, doesn’t it?
I feel like people are interpreting your comment with an American context. As a fellow European I agree, NGOs like Greenpeace are also to blame, and I don’t think those are financed by fossil fuel lobbies.
To justify the investment, it would need to become mainstream.
Is it some kind of exponentially decreasing probability amplitude curve?
Paul Watson will send stinky bombs in your bed.
It’s a bit hard to write without C and H, so gotta get over it.
You need to bring her offerings.
Is friction really negligible here?
For sure this explains a lot of religious rules but I think agent illusion is also a big contributor.
I’ve read a nice book from a French skepticism popularizer trying to explain the evolutionary origin of cognitive bias, basically the bias that fucks with our logic today probably helped us survive in the past. For example, the agent detection bias makes us interpret the sound of a twig snapping in the woods as if some dangerous animal or person was tracking us. It’s doesn’t cost much to be wrong about it and it sucks to be eaten if it was true but you ignored it. So it’s efficient to put an intention or an agent behind a random natural occurence. This could also be what religions grew from.
Fair point, I should specify “modern science”. There’s quite a gap of scientific quality between traditional medicine and modern science based medicine for example.
I heard it was discovered many times but it did not stick.